As there were ______ lifeboats for everybody. two choice>> 1

追风qrm2022-10-04 11:39:547条回答

As there were ______ lifeboats for everybody. two choice>> 1. very few 2. too few
which one is correct ,why?

已提交，审核后显示！提交回复

DEEVEN 共回答了24个问题 | 采纳率83.3%: The correct answer is ... too few.
Why? The key to this is:
***This sentence isn't really complete, it could be something like:
As there were too few lifeboats for everbody, (the captain decided women and children should be rescued first)".
因为这个句子以 As 开头,表示了一层因果关系.紧随其后的 ... "for everybody" 表明了是“太少”救生艇,不够给所有人乘坐.
假如只是单纯说救生艇不多,用 very few 就没错：
There were very few lifeboats. 语法正确且完整.
因此,必须透彻了解话中没说出来的意思再作选择.; 1年前

天舞梦共回答了61个问题 | 采纳率: too few
因为too few 强调语气很重。而且这句话的背景是lifeboat。。救生用的
very few只是说很少; 1年前

潇湘仙子小仙女共回答了22个问题 | 采纳率77.3%: 当然是1 few是个表示否定意义的词而too是常用于肯定句中的，否定句中常用either。; 1年前

as there were___lifeboats for everybody...1 as little 2 so l as there were___lifeboats for everybody...1 as little 2 so little 3 very few 4 too few 选择哪一个及为什么 haibolee1年前4: 古古1234 共回答了15个问题 | 采纳率86.7%

lifeboat是可数名词,排除AB,
因为这个句子以 As 开头,表示了一层因果关系.紧随其后的 ..."for everybody" 表明了是“太少”救生艇,不够给所有人乘坐.
假如只是单纯说救生艇不多,用 very few 就没错：
There were very few lifeboats.语法正确且完整.

1年前查看全部

As there are——lifeboats for everybody,somepeople had to jump As there are——lifeboats for everybody,somepeople had to jump into ... 内涵男人1年前2: rgwef 共回答了19个问题 | 采纳率94.7%

enough

1年前查看全部

在帮填几个空`谢谢!because there were not ___lifeboats and the ship C 在帮填几个空`谢谢! because there were not ___lifeboats and the ship Californian arrived too late to ___ more people. 这两个空是不是:many save 句型转换: i think the story is fantastic ___ ____ ____,the story is fantastic 屈平1年前1: 红色小坚果共回答了19个问题 | 采纳率100%

ecause there were not _enough__lifeboats and the ship Californian arrived too late to _save__ more people.
_In __ _my___ _opinion___,the story is fantastic

1年前查看全部

as做连词时As there were not enough lifeboats for everybody,1500 as做连词时 As there were not enough lifeboats for everybody,1500 lives were lost.这里的as是不是作为一个连词引导原因状语从句,后面的就可以跟逗号直接跟一个句子,如果没有as就不行,如果去掉as,句子变成There were not enough lifeboats for everybody,1500 lives were lost.这个句子就是错的,因为没有连词是不是? nyj95101年前3: 美满ff 共回答了19个问题 | 采纳率84.2%

是的,你的理解是对的,第二个句子之所以错误,是因为没有连词
连词的作用,就是连接两个句子的,你那第二个句子,只是以逗号相连,是没用的,就是说,没有连词,就只能有一个动词,而你的第二个句子,有了两个动词了.
可以改成：
There were not enough lifeboats for everybody, 1500 lives lost.
或：
There were not enough lifeboats for everybody, 1500 lives being lost
或：
there being not enough lifeboats for everybody,1500 lives were lost

1年前查看全部

as there were not enough lifeboats for everybody. 为什么用for,还是 as there were not enough lifeboats for everybody. 为什么用for,还是因为for和谁是词组, 如果用to替代for可以吗,为什么 王3420819171年前3: jplsy2001 共回答了21个问题 | 采纳率85.7%

【for】的用法
1.（表示对象）为了,给,对于
Isn't that enough for you?...那对你来说不够吗?
I have some free advice for you.我可以为你提供免费咨询.
2.帮助；为了
I hold a shop door open for an old person...我帮一位老人把住店门.
He picked the bracelet up for me.他帮我把手镯捡了起来.
这里for是指“给”或者“为了,帮助”
不能用“to”代替.因为：
to 带有一种方向性、目的性,而for 给人感觉是某种利益性更强.

1年前查看全部

For the reason that there were not enough lifeboats on the T For the reason that there were not enough lifeboats on the Titanic, many passengers lost their lives. 请问这句话中 for the reason that there were not.on the Titanic ,是什么从句? zhourun1年前6: 琦子共回答了24个问题 | 采纳率91.7%

1.译文：由于在泰坦尼克号上有没有足够的救生艇这个原因,许多乘客失去了生命.
2.语法：For the reason 是介词短语作状语,that there were not enough lifeboats on the Titanic 是同位语从句,说明名词 reason 的具体内容.

1年前查看全部