This was a lawmade in 1807,it banned all British people ___

a.give up 放弃 停止
b.put up 支起 张贴
c.deal with 处理
d.cut down 削减
选A
翻译：
对于烟民来说戒烟是有益处的,因为从3月1日开始在公共场所禁烟了.

消息屏蔽LZ支持我,.、.,.祝你学习向上!

C

考查固定短语用法。Ban sb. from doing sth.“禁止某人做某事”此处为被动语态。

As China's economy grows, too much private cars become a urgent promblems. it is often argured wether private cars should be banned.
Some people believe that owning private cars should be encouraged. More automobile business would boost domestic consumtion and lead to a more prosperous country.However, this view is not well justified as the drawbacks are not been considered.
Some other people say that private cars should be restricted, since the dramatic increse of private cars owned by citizens are already causing many negative effects, for instance, air pollutions, over crowded street,etc..
My point of view would be that, China, as a developing country, and also the woeld factory, deserves to create better-designed autmobiles,and China can not afford to restrain local car busines.Thus it had yet to reach the point of banning private cars in China .

你的帐户现在被冻结（封）了,请点击此处解决该问题.

Fluoride has been banned for using in AC units,lessening the ozone layer's depletion.
这句话当然不成立.
理由是现在分词的逻辑主语应该与句子主语保持一致.Fluoride只能是被使用于...中,而不是使用于...中
所以应该用现在分词被动形式
Fluoride has been banned for being used in AC units,lessening the ozone layer's depletion.
而这也不正确,因为ban的用法是加from而不是for来表示禁止做某事,这样就得改为
Fluoride has been banned from being used in AC units,lessening the ozone layer's depletion.
这样一来整个句子就显拖拉了.
而使用use的名词形式就不存在这些条条框框.
Fluoride has been banned for use in AC units,lessening the ozone layer's depletion.
use in AC units 在空调设备中的使用,in AC units 介词短语作use的后置定语
以上是我的理解,大家探讨一下
Lucy has completed courses of studying in ABC college.
(or)Lucy has completed courses of study in ABC college.
两个都对

题目不是很难,主要是考察对词意的理解和一些固定搭配,基本不涉及语法.
1-3是ban 这个词的用法,它即可作名词n.禁令,又可作动词vt（banned banning bans）.禁止,取缔(书刊等).
所以1选B;2选C;3选A(a pan on sth）.
4选D(originally 做‘原先’讲,副词）;5选B（pay back);6选D(固定搭配to the best of one's ability）；7选C;8选B；9A(意思是：这些道理在听众的思想上产生了作用）；10B(实行；活动);11C(操作的）；12B;13B;14B;15C（vt.
制成皮,钉皮,用皮革包盖用皮革抽打adj.皮革的,皮革制的leather gloves皮手套）；16B;17C;18A;19D(A意思是老式的,过时的,守旧的);20A
应该都正确吧.

Ban for smoking in public places
should smoking be banned in public places? lots of people may ask such a question, and what do you think about this? do you agree with that? in my opinion, i definitely think the the Smoking should be banned in public places despite of the the places are "PUBLIC", no mattter what reason you may possess, no matter how willing you are for smoking at that moment you are in the public place, the answer is "NO".Why? you may wonder, firstly, i suppose there are lots of people hate somebody who smokes in public places. not only for the places not belongs to his or her only, simply for the healthy environment, you cannot do so. Smoking, is harmful not to the smokers, but to the people around him. for smoking, you know, there is lots of smog penetrating the atmosphere and proliferating to anywhere around the smoking-area which is affecting the others' healthiness, then smoking should be banned in public places, and the smoking activies actully seriously injure the smokers' organs especially for that lung. says the statistics from the WHO, there is more than one third people died in lung cancer simply caused by that smoking. then what should you do about this? here, i want to give some constructive suggestions to those who still is addicting to smoking. just stop smoking, for what? only for yourown health, that's all, and to be better, you may consider your family, maybe you wife, your children, you parents, even the people who are concerning about you.
secondly, smoking in public places is one of the most disgusting things for people. smoking itself just a unenjoyable thing, needless to say that" Smoking in public places". yes, the answer still is that" of course, should be banned". however, a
considerable number of people still smoke in public places regardless of that the public hygiene and others'abomination. that's really a bothering thing to those people who really hate smoking and regard it as a loathsome activities(surely i am). the justification for banning smoking should be listed to you in details as following:
1. Firstly, the public places, yes, you know, not your own place, it is the public's, then by what reason should you smoke in public places? no way for you, it is not only for you, but for anyone else.
2. Secondly, smoking, it is not a good thing to everyone, it is not a entertainment, or recreation activities, just a habit, and a bad habit which being everyone should avoided addiction.
3. Thirdly, smoking is the killer to health, smoking not proved to be harmful to lung, but to trachea, brain etc. lots of deadly diseases are being caused by smoking.
4. Finally, I'd like to say, we are strongly advocating that" to protect the earth, to make our ecosystem sustainable and enjoyable", then what should we do for that? to protect the earth, one thing needs to do and well-known by everybody, yes, reducing the fume emission, we know how to reduct the car-tail fume emission, and turn off the lights when we leave from the room, and smoking also the same case, to make the air cleaner and more comfortable, then you should stop smoking, if you cannot do so easily, jsut force youself to draw out from the smoking addiction, and smoking's fume, is more harmfuly than the dioxide, it is complicated with lots hazardous gases in ingredients. such as the nicotine, and sulfur dioxide etc, each of them can drive humanbody into serious diseases.
In the end, i still have to say" Smoking absolutely should be banned in public places without doubt", not only for the smokers' health, but the publics', and to be more, for a more confortable life, a cleaner sky, an enjoyable air. a more beautiful earth. that's all.

Do not
祈使句的否定句是：Don't (= Do not ) + 动词原形

语法错误先不考虑的话,文章中关于希望禁烟的理由,没有能够非常有条理的说清楚,部分原因不合逻辑.不好意思比较直接点出来,因为三分之二的句子都需要进行部分改动,你是不是想表达下面的意思：
1、抽烟浪费钱,有害健康,举例：哮喘病人、降低患心血管类疾病概率
2、抽烟的人有口臭,影响交际.举例：不喜欢靠近抽烟的人,身上有怪味.
结论：希望禁烟

Not allowing smoking in public places and office building is a very good rule. I believe this for several reasons .Not only will banning smoking improve people’s health, it will also increase worker productivity and reduce conflicts.
we all know smoking is not healthy. Unfortunately, when smokers are able to smoke in public buildings, they can make other people sick . They may work with people who are allergic to smoking, for examples. In that case , the non-smokers have no choice unless they want to quit their jobs. They can only get sicker , which is unfair .Of course , banning smoking in public buildings and offices will please non-smokers. It will also improve the smokers’ health. They will have fewer opportunities to smoke, so they will smoke fewer cigarettes.
Banning smoking in office buildings can also increase worker productivity. Smokers won’t interrupt their work all the time to smoke. There will also be fewer worker absences. When smokers cut down the number of cigarettes, they will get fewer smoking related illnesses.
Finally, it is a good idea to ban smoking in public places and office buildings because a ban can reduce conflicts. Non-smokers tend to get annoyed and jealous because smokers have an excuse to take frequent breaks .The most significant conflict, however, is over whether smokers have a right to smoke in public . As we have already seen, non-smokers feel they are not always given a choice. If smoking in public is allowed , they will be forced to breathe harmful air. This may violate their rights, and non-smokers are angry with smokers because of it.
It seems clear that banning smoking n public places and office buildings is a good idea. It will reduce conflict and increase productivity. It will also benefit health of smokers and non-smokers alike. I believe that just about anything that improve our health is a good idea!

As we all know , alcohol is harmful to our body . But in order to make money , many companies have been making wine. And they advertise wine on the Tv ,newspapers , and radio. They use all kinds of ways to attract people to buy wine . Their advertisements can be seen all the time and all the places . Many adults are addicted to alcohol . so some accidents happen after they drink a lot of alcohol. On the other hand , even more and more teenagers begin to drink wine, which is bad to their minds and can make them become foolish . Maybe they must give up their study owing to alcohol. Last but not least , many people spend money in drinking wine, they can not live a normal life. They may be become the burden of society.
From what i said above, we can see clearly alcohol is not good to us , so we should take measures to prevent persons from drinking. All alcohol advertising should be banned.

1、适当的饮酒有益于身体健康
2、广告也可以起到良好的促进作用,可以在广告中更多的提倡合理饮酒

fall on+日期：(节日等)适逢(某日),正当(某日).
eg：His birthday falls on Sunday.
他的生日恰逢星期日.
这个意思还是挺少用的.bbc上出现过.
eg：1）They fell more than 2% to FF12.10 in early trading on the French stockmarket on Wednesday on top of a 3% fall on Tuesday.
BBC: Mickey and Minnie Mouse at EuroDisney
2）That came on top of a 3.9% fall on Tuesday that was prompted by a warning from rival Dell that it expected demand in the US market to weaken in the coming months.

翻译吗？
课堂里是否应当禁用移动电话（手机）？ 你可以写 120 个以上的 词 。。。。
-----
若要回答，请参考下文：
Should cell phones be banned in school?
As schools across the country grapple with cell-phone policies, New York City's strict ban has everyone talking
YES
As a former New York City public-school teacher, I can tell you that cell phones don't belong in the classroom. A student with a cell phone is an uninterested student, one with a short attention span who cares more about socializing than education.
When I was teaching, all too often I turned around from writing something on the blackboard to find students text-messaging or otherwise playing with their phones. Come the end of the term, a handful of students would fail the class and far too many would drop out of school. The onus for failure should be placed on distractions in the classroom, specifically cell phones. Parents think of cell phones as a connection to their children in an emergency. But I wonder what the last situation was that genuinely called for an immediate phone call to a child. In most cases, contacting the hospital or the police would seem more urgent. And parents can always call the school's main office to reach their children.Cell phones are status symbols for teenagers because when their phone rings while the teacher is talking, everyone laughs. Because playing video games on their cell makes them look cool. Because text messaging their friend in the next room is more fun than learning about topic sentences. So is listening to the new Three 6 Mafia song they just downloaded onto their cell.And saying students can store their phones in the locker is a joke. If they have cell phones, they're going to bring them to class.—Jesse Scaccia
Former English teacher, Franklin D. Roosevelt High School, Brooklyn, N.Y.

NO
Schools make rules to facilitate a quality education in a respectful and safe environment. Cell phones are a distraction in classrooms and have no place there. I support rules banning their use—by students and staff—in the classroom.But cell phones should not be banned from students' possession entirely, because that is, in effect, not allowing students to have cell phones while traveling to and from school.My children's time before school and after should not be under the school's control. Making sure my children have cell phones and can contact me during those times is my right as a parent.It's not just about safety or reassurance. Yes, I want my kids to call each morning when they arrive at school and each afternoon when they leave, and there are so few pay phones anymore on which to do that. But my children's lives are also enriched by the freedom to travel to a variety of extracurricular activities or social engagements without an adult chaperone. That is only possible because an adult is just a phone call away. If my children are not allowed to keep their cell phones during the school day—off and in their backpacks or lockers—the school system is governing my parenting and my children's behavior during non-school time. The school has no such right. Besides, teachers should be teaching, not spending precious time tagging and bagging confiscated electronics.I trust my kids to make responsible and respectful choices, and I trust their teachers and administrators to do the same.—Elizabeth Lorris Ritter
Parent, Bronx High School of Science, New York

Yes,it should be banned.Smoking does not only harm people's health,it also degrades social morality.According to the scientists,more than 30% of the smokers will die prematurely from lung cancer,emphysema,heart disease and other tobacco-caused diseases.And that does not include the kids who become addicted to spit (smokeless) tobacco.Currently,an estimated 4.5 million kids between the ages of 12 and 17 are smokers,collectively smoking more than 500 million packs of cigarettes a year.Apparently,smoking is affecting the youth,which also means that as long as smoking is undisciplined,our future generation will be surrounded with crime and misfortune as though living in a dim and hopeless environment.

There is no banned or encouraged on this field,just to be or not to be.

1.A
2.A
3.A
4.B
5.C
6.A
7.B
8.C
9.B
10.C
11.A instead of
12.A
13.A
14.C
15.C
16.A
17.B
18.A
19.B
20.B
21.C
22.C
23.A
24.C
25.C
26.A
27.A
28.A

楼上的语法问题好象满严重的

Did you ever imagine having a child that is the exact replica of you?Did you ever imagine of having the cure for heart disease or cancer?Well,these fantasies are not far from reach.The way we could re...

B.Do not

去掉 I think that
因为这部分和前面的介词短语In my opinion（依我看来）表意重复
请在客户端右上角评价点“满意”即可,

不明白你是求回答还是要翻译
体育运动中的动物应该被禁止么?为什么?

Do I think smoking should be banned in public spaces
I do ,never having smoked ,I find the smell of other peoples smoke repulsive .I also have a disabled daughter who has a congenital heart disorder - passive smoking will weaken her heart more than most and at aged 14 why should she have no say in things .
The trouble is where do public spaces end - restaurants ,pubs ,theatres etc.are good examples ,but so is the high street ,local park etc .If we ban all such public places where will the smokers go Perhaps there will be smoking rooms on every high street ,a smoking box in every park ( forget portaloo ,its here it's the new portabutt !)- perhaps they'll becme as seedy and out of place as sex shops !
Common sense will have to prevail ,but for that to happen both smokers and non smokers need to get their heads together to find a comprimise .

引用莎士比亚的：To download or not to download,that is a question.

法律禁止父母用姓氏或物品名称或产品名称为孩子起名.

Fluoride has been banned for using in AC units,lessening the ozone layer's depletion.
这句话当然不成立.
理由是现在分词的逻辑主语应该与句子主语保持一致.Fluoride只能是被使用于...中,而不是使用于...中
所以应该用现在分词被动形式
Fluoride has been banned for being used in AC units,lessening the ozone layer's depletion.
而这也不正确,因为ban的用法是加from而不是for来表示禁止做某事,这样就得改为
Fluoride has been banned from being used in AC units,lessening the ozone layer's depletion.
这样一来整个句子就显拖拉了.
而使用use的名词形式就不存在这些条条框框.
Fluoride has been banned for use in AC units,lessening the ozone layer's depletion.
use in AC units 在空调设备中的使用,in AC units 介词短语作use的后置定语
以上是我的理解,大家探讨一下
Lucy has completed courses of studying in ABC college.
(or)Lucy has completed courses of study in ABC college.
两个都对

The correct option is C which is beyong any doubut.
"Ban sb/sth from doing sth" is a received phrase which is widely used in English speaking countries in the similar semantic and logic structure with fixed phrases such as "prevent sb from doing sth," "bar/debar sb from doing sth," "stop sb from doing sth," "illegitimate sb from doing sth" and etc.