亚瑟王的英文全名是什么捏?

Sons of King Arthur and his knights亚瑟王的儿子们和他的骑士们
Sons of King Arthur and his knights’亚瑟王和他的骑士们的儿子们

传说:
传说中,远古时期的英雄亚瑟王（King Arthur）麾下拥有一群勇猛而忠贞的圆桌骑士,其中最著名的的圆桌骑士有12个,他们每个人都拥有属于自己的骑士称号.在这些圆桌骑士们的帮助下,亚瑟王成功统一了雷鸣大陆,并建立起强大的亚瑟王朝,成为拥有至高荣誉的英雄.
圆桌骑士的由来:
来源于亚瑟王的传说,是亚瑟王身边的著名骑士的统称,因他们聚会的桌子是个
圆桌而得名,著名的圆桌骑士有12个,他们分别是：
第一骑士:
Lancelot Du Lac (Launcelot) 兰斯洛特：亚瑟王圆桌武士中的第一勇士,他与王后格温娜维尔的恋情导致了他与亚瑟王之间的战争.
圆桌骑士里的第一勇士,温文尔雅,又相当勇敢,而且乐于助人.他曾出发去寻 找过圣杯,但由于他的骄傲使他没有成功.在王后开始进行火焰的试练时,兰斯洛特为了将她从火中救出而发动了一次不必要的战斗,这就导致了圆桌骑士的分 裂.在这场战斗后,兰斯洛特为了忏悔他的罪过而当了僧侣,直到他死去也没有 新的故事了.
他拥有“裁决骑士”称号：
象征着裁判与决断,是圆桌骑士中的第一骑士兰斯洛特爵士所拥有的骑士称号.
第二骑士:
Galahad ：加拉汉:在亚瑟王传说中,他是圆桌骑士中最纯洁的一位且独自一人找到了圣杯.
最纯洁完美的骑士,是兰斯洛特和Elaine（Pelles王的女儿）的儿子.他在刚来 到亚瑟王的宫殿的时候,就坐在了一个危险的座位上,因为这个位置的骑士将负 责寻找圣杯（Holy Grail）.但作为一个几乎完美的骑士,最终他还是把圣杯找到了.
他拥有着“永恒骑士”称号：
象征着永恒与完美,是圆桌骑士中最圣洁的骑士加拉汉爵士所拥有的骑士称号.
第三骑士:
Bors de Ganis 鲍斯：亚瑟王传奇的圆桌骑士之一,兰斯洛特爵士之侄
鲍斯国王的儿子,兰斯洛特爵士的堂兄,是最勇敢的骑士,三个最优秀的圆桌骑士之一.他见证了加拉汉爵士取得圣杯的功绩,在加拉汉死后他回到了亚瑟王身边,将这件事情详细的报告给了国王.他是一个相当忠诚的骑士.最后死于一次维护骑士精神的战斗中.
他是属于三圣杯骑士之一
他拥有着“守护骑士”称号：
象征着防守与护卫,是圆桌骑士中经历最为传奇的鲍斯爵士所拥有的骑士称号.
第四骑士:
Lamorak 拉莫洛克：圆桌骑士之一
Lamorak de Galis
拉莫洛克爵士是Pellinore国王的儿子,是三个最有力量的骑士之一,曾一次打败 过30个骑士,他的枪术在当时是被认为不可超越的.拉莫洛克爵士是Margawse王后的骑士.他最后被Mordred杀死,在拉莫洛克k正在对抗3个骑士的时候,Mordred悄悄走到背后,杀死了他
他拥有着“光辉骑士”称号：
象征着光明之辉,是圆桌骑士中枪术卓绝的拉莫洛克爵士所拥有的骑士称号.
第五骑士:
Gaheris 加赫雷斯：圆桌骑士之一
Gaheris也是奥克尼郡国王的儿子,他是加文爵士的弟弟,在成为骑士之前他 是他哥哥的侍从.他和他哥哥一起在火焰的试练中将Guenevere王后救出,虽然 这是一次意外事故,但兰斯洛特却不把他们当作自己人,从此加赫雷斯爵士在很长 一段时间里相当的恨兰斯洛特.
他拥有着:“圣战骑士”称号：
象征着圣战意志,是圆桌骑士中百折不挠的加赫雷斯爵士所拥有的骑士称号.
第六骑士:
Gareth 加雷斯：圆桌骑士之一,亚瑟王的侄子
奥克尼郡国王最年轻的儿子,亚瑟王的侄子.在刚进入亚瑟王的宫殿的时候隐藏 了他的名字和身份,凯爵士把他安排在厨房里打杂.加雷斯后来接受了Linnet 的任务,打败了黑武士,绿武士,蓝武士,棕武士,最后打败了红武士,将Linn et的姐姐Lionesse救了出来,并爱上了她.他们的爱受到了妹妹Linnet的阻挠,不过最后亚瑟王亲自出面,才有情人终成眷属.加雷斯最后在拯救王后事件中被兰斯洛特杀死
他拥有着 “斗魂骑士”称号：
象征着斗士之魂,是圆桌骑士中最年轻骁勇的加雷斯爵士所拥有的骑士称号.
第七骑士:
Bedivere 贝迪维尔：亚瑟王传奇中圆桌骑士之一,忠贞不贰, 负垂死亚瑟王登舟去Avalon岛.
对亚瑟王忠贞不二的骑士,他是在跟Mordred战斗中活下来的最后一个骑士,在亚瑟王认为自己已经受了致命伤的时候,他委托贝迪维尔把他的剑扔到湖里,但 前两次贝迪维尔舍不得扔,直到第三次才将剑扔掉.然后他将亚瑟王扶到湖边, 让亚瑟王坐着船前去 阿瓦隆岛.在这件事情后他就隐居到了一个偏僻的寺院,一直 在那里待着,直到他死去
他拥有着“雷霆骑士”称号：
象征着雷霆的骑士称号,是圆桌骑士中行动最为敏捷的贝迪维尔爵士所拥有.
第八骑士:
Gawaine 加文：圆桌骑士之一,亚瑟王的侄子
Gawain：
奥克尼郡国王最年长的儿子,他是在亚瑟王的婚礼上被授与的爵位.他曾拒绝让 加赫雷斯进行火焰的试练,但最后试练还是被允许了.在这次试练中,加文的弟弟在 兰斯洛特救王后的时候误杀了.加文非常悲痛,也曾因为这件事导 致了圆桌骑士的分裂而向兰斯洛特寻仇.但在他临死之前,还是原谅了 兰斯洛特,并为自己的恨意作了忏悔,最后他被葬在了多佛城堡.
他拥有着“智慧骑士”称号：
象征着智慧与经验,是圆桌骑士中最具智慧的加文爵士所拥有的骑士称号.
第九骑士:
Percivale 珀西瓦里：圆桌骑士之一.
Percivale
珀西瓦里王的儿子,除了加拉汗爵士外他是最出类拔萃的骑士了.他在陪同加拉汗找寻圣杯的途中碰到了Blanchefleur女士,珀西瓦尔最后跟她结了婚,跟 他们的儿子一起住在一起,后来成为了当地的国王.
他拥有着“圣光骑士”称号：
象征着拯救与重生,是圆桌骑士中最出类拔萃的骑士珀西瓦里爵士所拥有的骑士称号.
第十骑士:
Tristan 特里斯坦：亚瑟王时代的传奇中的人物,是一个骑士,爱上了与他的叔叔康沃尔国王马克订了婚的爱尔兰公主伊休尔特
Meloidas国王的儿子,平生喜欢音乐和唱歌,被称之为“多愁善感的骑士”.他作了马克国王的战士,尽管这个国王相当卑鄙,而且除了仇恨没有教给他任何东 西.他爱上了伊休尔特,但伊休尔特已经是注定是马克的新娘了.马克发现这点后相当愤怒,并把杀死了他们,但后来他又后悔了,于是把他们葬在一起,这样他们 就可以永远在一起了.
骑士称号:未知?
骑士效果:未知?
十一骑士:
Geraint 杰兰特：亚瑟王传奇里的一个圆桌骑士,伊妮德的丈夫.
Devon骑士Erbin的儿子,他恢复了Yniol爵士的领土范围并且爱上了Yniol爵士漂 亮的女儿伊妮德,最后跟她结了婚.在婚后伊妮德抱怨他太懒了,杰兰特对此深深 的感到了羞愧,然而后来他却错误的认为伊妮德对他不忠.因此他带着她进行了一次旅行,中途进行了很多次的试验,最后杰兰特终于相信伊妮德没有对他不忠, 于是两个人返回城堡,并快乐乐的度过了剩下的时光
骑士称号:未知?
骑士效果:未知?
十二骑士:
Kay 凯：亚瑟王传奇中,亚瑟王的义兄弟和理事
Ector爵士的儿子,和亚瑟王是兄弟（Ector是亚瑟王的养父）.当Ector第一次 参加比武竞技的时候,将剑忘在了旅店没有带出来,亚瑟王跑回去拿的时候旅店 已经关门了,没办法就随手把一把插在石头上的剑(石中剑)拔了出来.从此亚瑟王就成了 英国的国王.在Arthur当上国王后,他让Kay作了宫廷的管家.凯爵士有点管不住自己的嘴巴,但绝对是个可信的骑士
最后,轮到我们的骑士团首领兼备英国国王亚瑟王出场:
亚瑟王(Arthur)
英国国王,Uther国王的儿子,因为当时国王的仇敌想要杀死他,因此被大魔法师Merlin带到了Ector爵士的城堡里,并由Ector爵士抚养长大.后来因为拔出了石中剑（Excalibur）而被认为是上天注定的不列颠王.他是圆桌骑士精神的创始者,有着许许多多的传奇故事.亚瑟王最后在跟夙敌Mordred战斗的时候受了重伤,乘着船消失 在了Avalon岛.有说他死了的,也有说没有死的,不过他在离开前对贝迪维尔爵士说过：“我将前往魔幻之境.在那儿,我可以得到医治,只要还来的及的话. 如果英国需要我,我自然会再回来.”因此估计死去的可能性不大了
石中剑:
（The Sword in the Stone),亚瑟拔出的王者之剑.一说其为Excalibur的原型Caliburn.《不列颠诸王史》关于Caliburn的记载有亚瑟王用此剑一战杀掉攻击他的470名萨克逊士兵.
骑士精神
是西方上流社会的文化精神,其制度产生于中世纪欧洲的上层社会,骑士本身就是一些中、小、封建主,骑士身份的获得,是一名武士进入上层社会的标志,但这一般是世袭的.作为一种贵族封号,它必须经过长期的服役,并通过一定的仪式才能获得.如果出生于贵族家庭的子弟想成为骑士,他必须7、8岁后即按照自己出生的等级依次到高一级的封建主及其夫人身边当侍童,14岁后为随从,即见习骑士,接受专门武士骑士训练,21岁时通过严格的考试和隆重的,仪式,宣誓及其他宗教礼仪后,才正式取得骑士封号.从这样一种制度产生的文化,显然是一种封闭的,贵族文化,其文化精神也是一种贵族文化精神.骑士制度中有骑士不得与平民交手的规则,可见其气质.它看重身份,注意修养,恪守诺言,尊重法规,是一种是社会有序化的文化精神.”
"骑士精神和道德是上层社会的贵族文化精神,它是以个人身份的优越感为基础的道德与人格精神,但它也积淀这西欧民族远古尚武精神的某些积极因素.如别淋司基指出的”对个人的人格的爱护和尊重；为被压迫者和被迫者牺牲全部力量乃至生命的慷慨勇敢精神；把女子作为爱和美在尘世上的代表及作为和谐,和平与安慰的光辉之神而加以理想化的崇拜等等,西方学者指出：从选择品德的倾向来说,传统在欧洲占上风.在西方的文化传统中,中世纪的骑士精神对现代欧洲的民族性格的塑造起着极其重大的作用
骑士的主要精神如下:
谦卑 谦虚谨慎,互相尊重,互相帮助 正直 正义善良,不欺负弱小,不推委责任 牺牲 牺牲自己利益成全团队或者别人 公正 不偏袒、无私欲、了解情况处理纠纷 荣誉 人们的称赞和感谢,是骑士的最高荣誉 英勇 挺身而出,义无返顾地与邪恶事物斗争 怜悯 同情弱者,帮助那些需要帮助的人 精神 以理性对待尘世,要对得起自已的良心
骑士精神规范及基本准则如下:
保护老弱妇孺.
为公义而战以对抗不平与邪恶.
热爱家园.
为防卫教会而冒死犯难

　　King Arthur is a legendary British leader who, according to medieval histories and romances, led the defence of Britain against the Saxon invaders in the early 6th century. The details of Arthur's story are mainly composed of folklore and literary invention, and his historical existence is debated and disputed by modern historians.[2] The sparse historical background of Arthur is gleaned from various histories, including those of Gildas, Nennius and the Annales Cambriae. Arthur's name also occurs in early poetic sources such as Y Gododdin.[3]
　　The legendary Arthur developed as a figure of international interest largely through the popularity of Geoffrey of Monmouth's fanciful and imaginative 12th-century Historia Regum Britanniae (History of the Kings of Britain).[4] However, some Welsh and Breton tales and poems relating the story of Arthur date earlier than this work; these are usually termed "pre-Galfridian" texts (from the Latin form of Geoffrey, Galfridus). In these works, Arthur appears either as a great warrior defending Britain from human and supernatural enemies, or as a magical figure of folklore, sometimes associated with the Welsh Otherworld, Annwn.[5] How much of Geoffrey's Historia (completed in 1138) was adapted from such earlier sources, rather than invented by Geoffrey himself, is unknown.
　　Although the themes, events and characters of the Arthurian legend varied widely from text to text, and there was no one canonical version until Malory's Le Morte d'Arthur was published in 1485, Geoffrey's version of events often served as the starting point for later stories. Geoffrey depicted Arthur as a king of Britain who defeated the Saxons and established an empire over the British Isles, Iceland, Norway and Gaul. In fact, many elements and incidents that are now an integral part of the Arthurian story appear in Geoffrey's Historia, including Arthur's father Uther Pendragon, adviser Merlin, the sword Excalibur, his birth at Tintagel and his death at Camlann and final rest in Avalon. The 12th-century French writer Chrétien de Troyes, who added Lancelot and the Holy Grail to the story, began the genre of Arthurian romance that became a significant strand of medieval literature. In these French stories, the narrative focus often shifts from King Arthur himself to other characters, such as various Knights of the Round Table. Arthurian literature thrived during the Middle Ages but waned in the centuries that followed until it experienced a major resurgence in the 19th century. In the 21st century, the legend lives on, both in literature and in adaptations for theatre, film, television, comics and other media.
　　根本就是专说中的人物,出现在不同的小说中,经历有所不同.
　　Debated historicity
　　Arthur as one of the Nine Worthies, tapestry, c. 1385
　　Main article: Historical basis for King Arthur
　　The historical basis for the King Arthur legend has long been debated by scholars. One school of thought, citing entries in the Historia Brittonum and Annales Cambriae, sees Arthur as a genuine historical figure, a Romano-British leader who fought against the invading Anglo-Saxons sometime in the late 5th to early 6th century. The Historia Brittonum ("History of the Britons"), a 9th-century Latin historical compilation attributed in some late manuscripts to a Welsh cleric called Nennius, lists twelve battles that Arthur fought. These culminate in the Battle of Mons Badonicus, or Mount Badon, where he is said to have single-handedly killed 960 men. Recent studies, however, question the reliability of the Historia Brittonum as a source for the history of this period.[6]
　　The other text that seems to support the case for Arthur's historical existence is the 10th-century Annales Cambriae ("Welsh Annals"), which also links Arthur with the Battle of Mount Badon. The Annales dates this battle to 516–518, and also mentions the Battle of Camlann, in which Arthur and Medraut were both killed, dated to 537–539. These details have often been used to bolster confidence in the Historia's account and to confirm that Arthur really did fight at Mount Badon. Problems have been identified, however, with using this source to support the Historia Brittonum's account. The latest research shows that the Annales Cambriae was based on a chronicle begun in the late 8th century in Wales. Additionally, the complex textual history of the Annales Cambriae precludes any certainty that the Arthurian annals were added to it even that early. They were more likely added at some point in the 10th century and may never have existed in any earlier set of annals. The Mount Badon entry probably derived from the Historia Brittonum.[7]
　　This lack of convincing early evidence is the reason many recent historians exclude Arthur from their accounts of post-Roman Britain. In the view of the historian Thomas Charles-Edwards, "at this stage of the enquiry, one can only say that there may well have been an historical Arthur [but …] the historian can as yet say nothing of value about him".[8] These modern admissions of ignorance are a relatively recent trend; earlier generations of historians were less sceptical. The historian John Morris made the putative reign of Arthur the organising principle of his history of sub-Roman Britain and Ireland, The Age of Arthur (1973). Even so, he found little to say of a historic Arthur.[9]
　　The 10th-century Annales Cambriae, as copied into a manuscript of c. 1100
　　Partly in reaction to such theories, another school of thought emerged which argued that Arthur had no historical existence at all. Morris's Age of Arthur prompted the archaeologist Nowell Myres to observe that "no figure on the borderline of history and mythology has wasted more of the historian's time".[10] Gildas' 6th-century polemic De Excidio Britanniae ("On the Ruin of Britain"), written within living memory of Mount Badon, mentions that battle but does not mention Arthur.[11] Arthur is not mentioned in the Anglo-Saxon Chronicle or named in any surviving manuscript written between 400 and 820.[12] He is absent from Bede's early 8th-century Ecclesiastical History of the English People, another major early source for post-Roman history that mentions Mount Badon.[13] The historian David Dumville has written: "I think we can dispose of him [Arthur] quite briefly. He owes his place in our history books to a 'no smoke without fire' school of thought ... The fact of the matter is that there is no historical evidence about Arthur; we must reject him from our histories and, above all, from the titles of our books."[14]
　　Some scholars argue that Arthur was originally a fictional hero of folklore – or even a half-forgotten Celtic deity – who became credited with real deeds in the distant past. They cite parallels with figures such as the Kentish totemic horse-gods Hengest and Horsa, who later became historicised. Bede ascribed to these legendary figures a historical role in the 5th-century Anglo-Saxon conquest of eastern Britain.[15] It is not even certain that Arthur was considered a king in the early texts. Neither the Historia nor the Annales calls him "rex": the former calls him instead "dux" or "dux bellorum" (leader of battles).[16]
　　Historical documents for the post-Roman period are scarce, so a definitive answer to the question of Arthur's historical existence is unlikely. Sites and places have been identified as "Arthurian" since the 12th century,[17] but archaeology can confidently reveal names only through inscriptions found in secure contexts. The so-called "Arthur stone," discovered in 1998 among the ruins at Tintagel Castle in Cornwall in securely dated 6th-century contexts, created a brief stir but proved irrelevant.[18] Other inscriptional evidence for Arthur, including the Glastonbury cross, is tainted with the suggestion of forgery.[19] Although several historical figures have been proposed as the basis for Arthur,[20] no convincing evidence for these identifications has emerged.

你.这是寒假作业吗?
我也有这作业.
我正在写呢...
不过我只有杨柳风、亚瑟王与圆桌骑士、白鲸记的,没有劝导的
直接给你读书笔记啦.
这是我一个字一个字打出来的,（本人有些自恋,请不要在意.）
Monday,February 08,2010
The name of the book:King Arthur and the Knights of the Round Table
The author of the book:Thomas Malory
Summary:
Only the next king can pull the sword out of the stone.Many people try,but they cannot move sword.Then young Arthur tries,and it comes out easily.Now he is king.And he is a perfect king.His people love him very much.But one day,Sir Pellinore (one of his Knight) fights with him,because the bad Queen Morgan Le Fay sent him and told him something wrong.So the Sword in the Stone damaged.After that,King Arthur with Marlin——which person often help him,and has strong magic——found the Excalibur.Excalibur is a sword which founding by the Lady of the Lake.The sword was inside a magic scabbard——no one can kill a person with that scabbard.But Queen Morgan Le Fay took it into the black water.So at least,King Arthur was killed by a traitor——Mordred.The Excalibur was throwed into the lake by Sir Bedivere.
Comments:
At least,there is no ‘head of the table’ at a round table,and no one is at a privileged position.Thus the knights were all peers and there was no "leader" as there were at so many other medieval tables.There’re indications of other circular seating arrangements to avoid conflicts among early Celtic groups.However,one could infer importance on the basis of the number of seats each knight was removed from the king.The Siege Perilous ("dangerous chair") was reserved for knights of pure heart.
Digest:
①Words:archbishop castle helmet knight lady scabbard sword above
②Sentences:1.I will not always be here.
2.I only know that I love you.
3.I am the strongest of King Arthur’s Knights,so I will fight with you without a helmet.
Monday,February 15,2010
The name of the book:The Wind in the willows
The author of the book:Kenneth Granhame
Summary:
Toad is a dangerous driver.He has six accidents,and the police are very angry with him.But then Toad buys another car.His friends——Rat,Mole and Badger——have to stop him driving.They go to Toad’s house and try their best to stop him.But Toad escapes.He takes somebody’s car and drives it.The police catch him.But he escapes,too.He returns his home,but he finds that his house has been robbed by many weasels.But at least,Toad and his friends beat weasels,and Toad was different now!
Comments:
This is a Famous article written by the American writer Helen Keller,who was both deaf and blind.
In this passage Helen mainly warned us to be aware of our listless attitude towards life.And asking us to care the things we always thought to be ordinary.Finally,her advice of "it would be an excellent rule to live each day as if we should die tomorrow" Gives me the deepest impression.
Digest:
①Words:caravan dust row hole stick tunnel wild willow adventure judge lock officer prison washerwoman
②Sentences:1.I hate being unkind to Toad.
2.But there isn’t a tunnel.
3.We’ll have a lot of work tomorrow.
Friday,February 19,2010
The name of the book:Moby Dick
The author of the book:Herman Melville
Summary:
Captain Ahab hates Moby Dick--“the white devil”--because he lost a leg to the white whale in a fight.Now Ahab,the captain of a whaling ship,can only think of one thing.He has to find Moby Dick and kill him.Many of the other sailors on the ship don't know about their captain's plan.Ishmael is a young sailor and this is his first whaling job.He and his new friend,Queequeg,sail with Captain Ahab on this exciting and dangerous trip.Also on the ship are Starbuck,Srubb,and other whalers from different countries.He is prepared to sacrifice everything,including his life,the lives of his crew members,and even his ship to find and destroy his nemesis
Comments:
All of the members of the Pequot’s crew have biblical-sounding,improbable,or descriptive names,and the narrator deliberately avoids specifying the exact time of the events and some other similar details.These together suggest that the narrator—and not just Melville—are deliberately casting his tale in an epic and allegorical mode.
Digest:
①Words:sail rich death ocean dream die star sleep gold sky fight rope harpoon
②Sentences:1.Will you watch our ship when I fight Moby Dick?
2.He sat high up in the sails and watched.
3.Moby Dick came to the top of the water.

On the King Arthur legend,how the birth of the first,from where they are undiscovered.King Arthur is not exactly to a certain historical figure as a basis for shaping out of the fictional character is unknown.If the character of King Arthur did exist,presumably the age he lived about AD 500,during a period of 50 years (in accordance with known version of the King Arthur) of the period.Saxon (English Saxon; German Sachsen),also translated Saxons,originally Germanic barbarians,the early distribution of Leonid today in Germany Saxony (Niedersach

《亚历山大东征记》

阿瑟王和他的圆桌武士留下许多传奇,寻找圣杯是其中的一则.
一天晚上,当阿瑟王与众武士在大厅中饮宴时,忽然有响雷轰轰,雷声之
后,耀眼光亮使人睁不开眼睛,然后圣杯出现了,上面盖着镶金线的白色古；
因为光太强,没有人真正看到圣杯,或是谁在捧着它.但是在场的人,都坚信
它的存在是千真万确的.
等到圣杯随着强光失去踪影之后,大厅显得出奇地缄默,阿瑟王站起来说：
「让我们感谢神,他认为我们配见圣杯,配得祝福.」
王说完坐下来后,盖文勋爵走上前来,屈膝向王请求说：「圣杯的出现,
虽证明我们千真万确受到祝福,但它被包盖得好严密,我们不能说真正看到了
它.因此,我现在起誓明天一早,就动身去寻找圣杯,未得到它之前,绝不回
来.」
盖文勋爵回到他在圆桌的座位之后,又有好几个武士站起来发同样的誓言.
阿瑟王听到之后很难过,因为他意识到圆桌武士的团契不复存在了.
次晨离去的武士中还有兰斯劳特,他是最受阿瑟王恩宠的勋爵和歌拉海勋
爵.
兰斯劳特充耳不闻,站起来就冲进房间,看见大厅正中有一张银桌,银桌
之上是盖着红色古的圣杯,有许多天使围护.兰斯劳特继续前行,还没有靠
近银桌,就感到一股热气向他袭来,把他冲昏了,跌倒在地面.他觉到有许多
手把他抬起来,搁在门外的地上,后来才被别人找到.
他昏迷了廿四个昼夜才醒过来,意识上自己虽然见到圣杯,却不配得到它,
就沮丧地打道回府.
歌拉海走近圣坛,终于看到圣杯的真貌,马上虔恭地跪了下来.就在他仍
然跪的时候,他的灵魂脱离了他的躯壳,被天使们拥上天堂,有一只大手自
上空伸出来,抓住了圣杯,也冉冉升空.
于是圣杯的寻找从此中止,自那以后不再有人蒙恩碰到过圣杯了.