外国文学人物作品简介写人物的简介,专门介绍那个人物的,200字,急是作品中的人物,

经典之所以会成为经典,就在于它传达给我们的精神,就像保尔,让我们知道一个人如何度过自己的一生,才是不虚度的.就像《简爱》,让我们知道真爱与其他一切外在的东西无关.阅读名著,会让我们如沐春风,从名著中找到力量,找到我们为人处世的方法.让我们更加努力,为我们自己的梦想努力.

湖畔派诗人同情法国大革命,对资本主义工业文明和金钱关系感到不满,主张回到大自然,复兴宗法制,寄情湖畔山水,歌颂大自然,缅怀中世纪,借此表示他们对现实社会的不满和憎恶.代表诗人是华兹华斯,他开创了以歌颂大自然,描写内心世界为主的浪漫派诗风,以《抒情歌谣集》为例,他认为诗是人性和自然的形象,大自然和人的热情可以合二为一,强调人与自然的共鸣；他的诗歌,也都以优雅恬静的自然景象作为描写对象,风格清新明朗,时而又有淡淡的哀伤,语言朴素,形式舒展自如.这类诗歌最突出的特点就是融情于景、情景交融.我认为,该派的诗人们是用一种出世的心态在看待世界,重视的是心灵上的感悟,对精神层面的要求比较高,对于社会生活似乎更偏向于理论层面.文笔清新,寄情山水,表现出诗人们追求的是精神上的感悟,这和道家出世的观念很像,想必正是这种超脱于世俗的人生观锻造出诗人们纯真的笔触吧.
撒旦派诗人在思想上和湖畔派诗人有分歧；在艺术上,他们继承并发展了湖畔派开创的浪漫主义诗歌传统.撒旦派诗人蔑视传统、敢于斗争.雪莱是该派的代表诗人,他是第一个表现出空想社会主义理想的诗人,作品大多以大自然为歌颂对象,气势磅礴、想象丰富、色彩瑰丽、象征性强,既描写自然景物,又有政治抒情性.诗人借这些作品歌颂自然歌颂爱情,歌唱理想歌唱人生,表现对光明、自由、幸福和美好生活的热烈追求,给人以一种积极向上的力量和无尽的艺术享受.在我看来,此派的诗歌有着入世的力量,诗人们是借助文字的力量真正抒发出了自己的主张,有明显的个人色彩,并且文字贴合当时的实际,表现出一种一往无前的精神,他们敢去破坏传统,接受新事物,这一点是湖畔诗人做不到的.比较起来撒旦派作品中表现出来的想法,诗人们想要的自由是真正的自由,破除旧事物,对新事物充满信心充满了希望,而湖畔派却有些优柔寡断,诗人们追求的比较虚无,不能和旧事物完全割舍开来.

　　外国文学名著简爱英文读后感
　　Oliver Twist,one of the most famous works of Charles Dickens’,is a novel reflecting the tragic fact of the life in Britain in 18th century.
　　The author who himself was born in a poor family wrote this novel in his twenties with a view to reveal the ugly masks of those cruel criminals and to expose the horror and violence hidden underneath the narrow and dirty streets in London.
　　The hero of this novel was Oliver Twist,an orphan,who was thrown into a world full of poverty and crime.He suffered enormous pain,such as hunger,thirst,beating and abuse.While reading the tragic experiences of the little Oliver,I was shocked by his sufferings.I felt for the poor boy,but at the same time I detested the evil Fagin and the brutal Bill.To my relief,as was written in all the best stories,the goodness eventually conquered devil and Oliver lived a happy life in the end.One of the plots that attracted me most is that after the theft,little Oliver was allowed to recover in the kind care of Mrs.Maylie and Rose and began a new life.He went for walks with them,or Rose read to him,and he worked hard at his lessons.He felt as if he had left behind forever the world of crime and hardship and poverty.
　　How can such a little boy who had already suffered oppressive affliction remain pure in body and mind?The reason is the nature of goodness.I think it is the most important information implied in the novel by Dickens-he believed that goodness could conquer every difficulty.Although I don’t think goodness is omnipotent,yet I do believe that those who are kind-hearted live more happily than those who are evil-minded.
　　For me,the nature of goodness is one of the most necessary character for a person.Goodness is to humans what water is to fish.He who is without goodness is an utterly worthless person.On the contrary,as the famous saying goes,‘The fragrance always stays in the hand that gives the rose’,he who is with goodness undoubtedly is a happy and useful person.People receiving his help are grateful to him and he also gets gratified from what he has done,and thus he can do good to both the people he has helped and himself.
　　To my disappointment,nowadays some people seem to doubt the existence of the goodness in humanity.They look down on people’s honesty and kindness,thinking it foolish of people to be warm-hearted.As a result,they show no sympathy to those who are in trouble and seldom offer to help others.On the other hand,they attach importance to money and benefit.In their opinion,money is the only real object while emotions and morality are nihility.If they cannot get profit from showing their ‘kindness’,they draw back when others are faced with trouble and even hit a man when he is down.They are one of the sorts that I really detest.
　　Francis Bacon said in his essay,‘Goodness,of all virtues and dignities of the mind,is the greatest,being the character of the Deity,and without it,man is a busy,mischievous,wretched thing,no better than a kind of vermin.’
　　That is to say a person without goodness is destined to lose everything.Therefore,I,a kind person,want to tell those ‘vermin-to-be’ to learn from the kind Oliver and regain the nature of goodness.

wenku.baidu.com/view/a4911f4569eae009581b ...2011-6-6 - 百度快照
答案就在这里

　　小王子英文读后感
　　the Little Prince – A Tale of Love and Life
　　Title: the Little Prince
　　Author: Antoine de St-Exupery
　　Main Characters: the little prince, the pilot, the rose, the fox, the snake, etc.
　　Despite I’ve not in my childhood yet, I still prefer reading fairy-tale stories. the tales, which accompany with me in my old days, often make me think of some precious experience and sensation which only belong to children. This summer I’ve review this kind of tale, which was published in 1940. It’s the world-famous fairy-tale by the French author, Antoine de St-Exupery, The Little Prince.
　　As many other fairy-talethe outline of The Little Prince is not very complex. “I”, the narrator of the story, is a pilot whose plane has something wrong and lands in the Sahara. In this occasion, the pilot makes the acquaintance of the little prince, a little boy from another planet, the Asteroid B612. The little prince has escaped from his tiny planet, because he has some quarrel with a rose, which grows on his planet. In that case he left his own planet and took an exploration at some neighbor asteroids.
　　On his all-alone journey, the little prince meets different kinds of people, which includes a king, a conceited man, a tippler, a businessman, a lamplighter and a geographer. From these people he gets a conclusion that the grown-ups are very odd. Following the instruction of the geographer, he descends in the Sahara, on the earth.
　　Traveling onthe earth, the little prince, who sees a garden of five-thousand roses, is overcome with astonishment and sadness, as he considers his rose is unique in the universe before. At that time a fox appears. The fox, who tell the little prince about the meaning of the word “tame”, becomes his new friend. At the time to say farewell, the fox makes him know that his rose is unique because she is his rose and tamed by him. From that the little prince begins to treasure friendship and be responsible to his rose.
　　《茶花女》英文读后感
　　---Book Review: “Camille”
　　I read the Chinese version of “Camille” a few years ago. At that time I was deeply moved by the main character Marguerite Gautier. “Camille” or “The Lady of the Camellias” by Alexandre Dumas, fils, is the story of Marguerite Gautier, a young courtesan, or kept woman, in Paris in the mid 1800's, and how she falls in love with a young man, Armand Duval, and then tries to escape from her questionable past. Unfortunately, it comes back to haunt her and she ends up returning to that life and dies painfully and alone, but with the knowledge that she was a noble woman at heart. When I first began to read the book, I did not care for Marguerite or her attitude or lifestyle, but as I got further into the narrative, I realized that her saucy attitude was a front to cover the lonely woman that she really was. She felt used, abused and unloved, until the gentle Armand Duval came into her life and showed her that he loved her as a person and not for what she could do for him. It must have taken great courage for Marguerite to leave the life she had lived for so long, knowing all along that it was probably too good to be true and would not last indefinitely. And it also showed that Marguerite really loved Armand Duval for she could even change herself for him.
　　However, happiness didn’t last for long. When M. Duval, Armand's father, came to her, pleading for her to leave Armand to save both Armand's reputation and that of his younger innocent sister, Marguerite saw a way to become pure of heart, if not in body. She felt that it was her duty, because she loved Armand so much, to do this even though it meant giving up her own happiness and hurting Armand temporarily. She reluctantly returned to her former life, knowing that some day Armand would forgive her. Sadly, she died in debt and basically alone, except for her one female friend, Julie Duprat, who helped her during her illness. She had her journal sent to Armand after her death, explaining why she had made the choices she had. I think Dumas's last few lines about Marguerite being the exception, not the rule were quite true, and I also agreed with his view that while her lifestyle could not be condoned, we as a society assume that all of these type of women are cold and heartless, while this may not always be the case. A person can make the wrong choices in life when they are young, and try to redeem themselves, but sometimes past situations prevent them from changing their lives, even though they desperately wish to do so. This applies to both men and women in many different types of circumstances: involvement in crime; drug or alcohol abuse; gambling; prostitution; financial problems; poor marriage choices; etc. And this is the fact, which exists in the whole society.
　　As far as the other characters in the book, I think Marguerite was right in saying that no one truly cared about her, but only wanted something from her, the only exceptions being Armand and Julie Duprat. Of course, the Comte de G. and Comte de N. wanted her body and appearance. The Duke needed to “wake up and smell the coffee” and realize that she could never replace his dead daughter. If he truly cared, he could have helped her leave her lifestyle without “keeping” her himself. And lastly, Prudence was a blood-sucking leech who used Marguerite almost worse than the men. I also think she was jealous of the fact that Marguerite had so much more courage than herself and someone truly loved her.
　　《傲慢与偏见》英文读后感
　　〖文字大小：大 中 小〗 〖打印〗 〖收藏到： QQ 百度 雅虎〗 〖在线字典〗
　　Many people simply regard Pride and Prejudice as a love story, but in my opinion, this book is an illustration of the society at that time. She perfectly reflected the relation between money and marriage at her time and gave the people in her works vivid characters. The characters have their own personalities. Mrs. Bennet is a woman who makes great efforts to marry off her daughters. Mr. Bingley is a friendly young man, but his friend, Mr. Darcy, is a very proud man who seems to always feel superior. Even the five daughters in Bennet family are very different. Jane is simple, innocent and never speaks evil of others. Elizabeth is a clever girl who always has her own opinion. Mary likes reading classic books. (Actually she is a pedant.) Kitty doesn’t have her own opinion but likes to follow her sister, Lydia. Lydia is a girl who follows exotic things, handsome man, and is somehow a little profligate. When I read the book, I can always find the same personalities in the society now. That is why I think this book is indeed the representative of the society in Britain in the 18th century.
　　The family of gentleman in the countryside is Jane Austen’s favourite topic. But this little topic can reflect big problems. It concludes the stratum situation and economic relationships in Britain in her century. You can find these from the very beginning of this book.
　　The first sentence in this book is impressive. It reads: “It is a truth well known to all the world that an unmarried man in possession of a large fortune must be in need of a wife”. The undertone is very clear: the foundation of the marriage at that time is not emotion but possession.
　　People always think that Austen was an expert at telling love stories. In fact, the marriage in her book is not the result of love, but the result of economic needs. After reading this book, I know the truth is that a poor woman must be in need of a husband, a wealthy man.
　　I couldn’t forget how eager Mrs. Bennet wants to marry off her daughters. If you want to know why she is so crazy about these things, I must mention the situation in Britain at that time. Only the eldest son had the privilege of inheriting his father’s possessions. Younger sons and daughters who are used to luxurious lives have no choice but marry a man or woman in possession of a large fortune to continue their comfortable lives. Thus, we can see that getting married is a way to become wealthier, particularly for women without many possessions. Jane Austen told us that money and possession determined everything, including marriage and love in her century.
　　In “Pride and Prejudice”, the sister of Mr. Bingley strongly opposed his plan of marrying Jane because the Bennets don’t have many possessions and their social positions are much lower than them. From this, we can see there are a lot of obstacles for a not very rich woman to marry a wealthy husband. The society, the relatives would not allow them to get married.
　　In modern society, although the marriages of economic needs have decreased rapidly, the concept of “money determines everything” is still rooted in some people’s mind. A lot of parents try hard to interfere their children’s marriages. Education background, possessions, jobs remains the main reason that may influence one’s marriage. Marry for money is still a big problem in our society. We can’t help thinking: can money determine everything?
　　Austen left this problem for us to think. The genius of Jane Austen lies in this perfect simplicity, the simplicity that reflects big problems. Although Austen was only 21 when she wrote “Pride and Prejudice”, her sharp observation of social lives makes the style of this book surprisingly mature and lively. The plots in her works are always very natural. The development of the plot is as inevitable as a problem in mathematics. I think the depth of Pride and Prejudice is the reason that makes this book prominent and classic. Today, her book still can be the guide telling us the economic relationships both at her time and in modern time.

　　1 古希腊文学随着社会的发展经历了三个时期,其中"罗马"时期的主要成就是
　　神话和荷马史诗.
　　2 在古希腊工剧的鼎盛时期,雅典产生了三大悲剧诗人,他们的生活和创作
　　标志了索福克勒斯 欧里庇得斯 埃斯库罗斯,他们的代表作分别为 :、、
　　3 但丁.阿里盖利 是意大利民族文学的奠基者,也是欧洲中世纪到文艺复兴
　　的过渡时期的代表性作家,其里程碑式的作品是.
　　4 继但丁之后,意大利的 彼特拉克 和 薄迦丘 分别是诗歌和小说创作上开
　　了新文学的先河,后者的 是欧洲文学史上第一部现实主义小
　　说,两位是意大利人文主义文学的代表.
　　5 拉伯雷是法国人文主义文学平民倾向的杰出代表,其代表作是
　　6 十六世纪中叶,产生于西班牙的一类以无业游民为主人公的新型小说是
　　流浪汉小说,这小说最早也是最优秀的作品是.
　　7 塞万提斯 是文艺复兴时期西班牙杰出的小说家,戏剧家和诗人,其代表作
　　是.
　　8 、上下篇、是莎士比亚历史剧
　　的代表.
　　9 莎士比亚在1601后至1607年创作的四大悲剧是、、
　　、.

1,学过《马列文论》吗?,“人的本质力量对象化”和“人化自然”、“自然人化”这些经典命题来自马克思《1844年经济学哲学手稿》；2,“接受美学”（Receptional Aesthetic）这一概念是由德国康茨坦斯大学文艺学教授尧斯在1967年提出的.接受美学的核心是从受众出发,从接受出发.所以这儿填读者或受众,应该都问题不大.3,A错（文学具有审美意识形态性,要从形式和思想两个方面来分析,不过鉴于童的说法是这样的；考虑

大卫 科波菲尔

可多了!比如
20世纪欧美现实主义文学
1、劳伦斯《虹》
2、罗曼.罗兰《约翰.克利斯朵夫》
3、海明威《老人与海》
4、玛格丽特.米切尔《飘》
20世纪苏俄文学著名代表
5、高尔基自传体长篇三部曲《童年》《在人间》《我的大学》
6、肖洛霍夫《静静的顿河》
各国现代主义文学
7、艾略特《荒野》
8、卡夫卡《变形记》
9、奥尼尔《毛猿》
10、普鲁斯特《追忆似水年华》
11、乔伊斯《尤利西斯》
12、福克纳《喧哗与骚动》

神话是人类最早的幻想性口头散文作品.人类童年时期的产物,文学的先河.神话产生的基础是远古时代生产力水平低下和人们为争取生存、提高生产能力而产生的认识自然、支配自然的积极要求.史诗是一种以长篇叙事为体裁讲述英雄人物（来源于历史或神话中）的经历或事迹的诗.悲剧是戏剧的主要体裁之一.它渊源于古希腊,由酒神节祭祷仪式中的酒神颂歌演变而来.在悲剧中,主人公不可避免地遭受挫折,受尽磨难,甚至失败丧命,但他们合理的意愿、动机、理想、激情预示着胜利、成功的到来.