Armed with a torch,the vicar went up into the clock tower,这句

sun3042022-10-04 11:39:541条回答

Armed with a torch,the vicar went up into the clock tower,这句话如果我想改异种说法
我想改为用伴随状语的说法是不是应该这样说
Taking a torch,the vicar went up into the clock tower,
请从语法角度分析下

已提交,审核后显示!提交回复

共1条回复
libbycap 共回答了24个问题 | 采纳率95.8%
是的.前句armed with是因为与vicat是动宾关系,且有短语be armed with;后句take与vicar是主谓关系,故用现分形式.
1年前

相关推荐

armed with a torch, the vicar went up into the clock tower t
armed with a torch, the vicar went up into the clock tower to see what was going on.
请问 armed 在这是什么意思,什么语法,为什么要用ed形式,而且还用在句首,
然后tower后面的to是什么作用,什么语法
骄傲满屋1年前1
sara311 共回答了19个问题 | 采纳率94.7%
armed with a torch是分词结构,做提前的“定语”,伴随went,同时发生.
armed with a torch== he was armed with - - - -and went up -- - -
“Armed with a torch,the vicar went up into the …”
“Armed with a torch,the vicar went up into the …”
armed是非谓语动词还是形容词?为什么?
alitian_07121年前1
这个用户名存在么 共回答了21个问题 | 采纳率81%
Armed with a torch,the vicar went up into the …
解析:armed在这里表示伴随状态,作状语.
中文:带着一只手电筒,牧师走进了.
Armed with a torch,he went into the room.
Armed with a torch,he went into the room.
请问这里的armed是过去分词吗,这里的过去分词的作用是
瓜洲古渡口1年前2
萍子_cc 共回答了19个问题 | 采纳率94.7%
是的.做状语,伴随动作,补充说明he went into the room的情况