父子关系祖国的首都北京欢迎来到祖国的首都北京,这里是全国政治、经济、文化的中心在这里,你可以：感受大自然的美丽体验生活的

文中的那位老汉,他作为一名共产党员,在生死关头,一心想着村民,宁可牺牲自己,也要保护村民们的安全,体现了老汉舍己为人的高尚品德.老汉这种舍小家为大家的精神值得我们大家学习.老汉这种高尚的品德更值得我们学习.
其实,在日常生活中也有许多这样的人,他们舍己为人,不徇私情,大公无私.为了更多人的生命,他们毫不犹豫地选择了把生的希望留给别人,把死的危险留给自己.

因为Aa Bb Cc 这样的话,第一对老虎把船划过去了,谁把船划回来呢?要有人划船回来,所以不对.
正确答案是这样的.
大老虎为A B C,他们的孩子为a b c.
1：A a过河,A回来,对岸是a
2：b c过河,a回来,对岸是b c
3:A a过河,A回来,对岸是a b c
4:A B过河,c回来,对岸是A a B b
5:C c一起过河

小题1:B
小题1:D
小题1:A
小题1:A
小题1:C


小题1:细节题：从第一段的句子：The father-chlild relationship（父子关系）is the most important because in many families the father is the head of the family and a role model to his children.可知答案是B。
小题1:猜词题：从前面的句子：so they spend less time with their family and children.可知答案是D。
小题1:细节题：从第五段的句子：If your child tells you she or he loves her or his mother more . you should know that you haven’t spent enough time with the child 可知答案是A
小题1:推理题;从第五段的句子：If your child tells you she or he loves her or his mother more . you should know that you haven’t spent enough time with the child 可知这篇文章是写给父亲的。选A
小题1:从第一段的句子：The father-chlild relationship（父子关系）is the most important可知父亲和孩子的关系是最重要的。选C

如果叔叔和侄子都是唯一的话，那他们本身就是父子

父子关系：father-child relationship
母子关系：mother-child relationship

The realation of the farther and the son is very difficult to explain.As it always changes with the time goes on,such as ,who is more clever,or who is stronger than the other
As a father,he is usually the god in the little son.What the father does is always correct.and the son think:"My father is so strong,he must can do everything." But as the times goes on,the son is growing older,he finds his father also has some faults.Such he ofen coughs in the midnight ,as the result of the escessive smoking.The father may has to stop to have a rest,even the work is not very heavy.What the father says has something wrong too.
Though,there is something that couldn't change.That is the love.Wheather who is stronger ,or who is clever,they are always loving each other,and would never change forever.

姑侄关系

父亲病了之后喘气父亲快咽气时“我”不停地叫他

《后汉书》：世祖光武皇帝讳秀,字文叔,南阳蔡阳人,高祖九世之孙也,出自景帝生长沙定王发.发生舂陵节侯买,买生郁林太守外,外生巨鹿都尉回,回生南顿令钦,钦生光武.
刘邦生文帝刘恒,
刘恒生景帝刘启,
刘启生长沙定王刘发,
刘发生舂陵节侯刘买,
刘买生郁林太守刘外,
刘外生巨鹿都尉刘回,
刘回生南顿令刘钦,
刘钦生刘秀.
到刘秀是第九代.

听我讲一个《子游问孝》的典故.有一次孔子的学生子游问老师什么是“孝”.孔子说：“一般人所能做到的孝仅仅是能够赡养父母罢了.但是像猫狗这样的宠物尚且被人们饲养喜爱.如果对待父母没有顺从恭敬的心态,那么用什么来区分孝顺与饲养呢?”孔子的话虽然说得有些逆耳,不过我们不得不称道圣人的教训实在是金玉良言.父母和子女所处的时代不同,思想观念和文化水平当然会有所不同,看待事情的角度自然也就不一样.这一点是做子女的应该体谅的.我们讲求的快乐包括物质和精神的共同享受,现在大多数的子女都能够满足父母的物质消费,所以“孝”的要求也就相应提高,如果不顺从父母的意愿做事使他们开心,又怎么满足他们的精神享受呢?喂饱小猫小狗之后还知道给它们一些线团皮球之类的东西让它们自得其乐,难道“生我劬劳”的“哀哀父母”还不如它们么?其实父母会对子女提出什么非份要求吗?只不过是子女因为各种各样的不愿去做罢了.只要稍微用一点自制力,兄弟就可以做到“孝”了.子女有对父母的赡养的义务,不管有钱或没钱都是必须履行的.如果有可能的话,请劝劝老人.假若自己子女实在没有钱,也不要逼得太紧；把儿子逼死人更没人管他.愚直之言,言语唐突,若有冒犯,望乞海涵.但是诚意全君孝节,拳拳之心,希望兄弟能够明鉴.

特征的父子关系实际是指两个特征的依赖关系,比如后一个特征是是在前一个特征的一个表面上进行拉伸,那么后一个特征就是依赖于前一个特征而存在的,这时候也就可以说这两个特征具有父子关系,前一个特征是父特征,后一个特征是子特征.如果前一个特征失败那么将会导致后一个特征跟随失败.
建立正确的父子关系的一个基本原则就是创建特征的时候确实只使用必须使用的参考!

C

1
Father And Son
As related to Absalom and Achitophel
Absalom and Achitophel begins in the world of Old Testament history. The
vague biblical past of the opening lines lets the narrative to be set
from 2 Samuel in a wide historical frame that hopes to legitimize the
king's promiscuity by associating the king as father of the land:
In pious times, e'r priestcraft did begin, Before polygamy was made a sin;
When one man on many multiplied his kind, Ere one to one was cursedly confined;
When nature prompted and no law denied Promiscuous use of concubine and bride;
Then Israel's monarch after Heaven's own heart, His vigorous warmth did variously impart
To wives and slaves; and, wide as his command, Scattered his Maker's image through the land. (l. 1-10)
The association between God and David is made through the clever
comparison of divine and human fertility. There is some irony in seeing
God's abundant creation reflected in the king's sexual extravagances, but
the irony doesn't reduce the status of the king. It serves, at the
beginning of the poem, to separate the person of the king from the office
of the king.
The opening scenes emphasize David as an indulgent father, not as head of
the country. David's pleasure in Absalom parallels God's attitude toward
Adam in the Garden. All of Absalom's motions are accompanied with grace,
And paradise was opened in his face.
With secret joy indulgent David viewed
His youthful image in his son renewed:
To all his wishes nothing he denied;
And made the charming Annabel his bride. (l. 29-34)
The easy going nature of Absalom, put together with the specific
reference to paradise, help establish him as the figure from Eden that
will be seen again in the temptation. The characterization of David
emphasizes a combination of divine and human paternity. Like God, David
takes great joy in his creation; like God, he supplies Absalom with a
worthwhile bride. This serious presentation of David in his fatherly joy
and indulgence, as compared to the divine model, cannot be taken as
criticism of the king. It strengthens the casual relationship between God
The emphasis is on David's paternal indulgence. The initial presentation
of David and Absalom closes with a declaration of the calm of David's
reign:
Thus praised and lived the noble youth remained,
While David, undisturbed, in Sion reigned.
Next, Achitophel calls Absalom the country's cloudy pillar, guardian
fire, and second Moses (ll. 233-35). All three are familiar biblical
signs; and the pillar and fire are promised in Isaiah as signs of god's
renewed presence among the Israelites (Isaiah 4:5). The typical signs
that Achitophel mentions have general biblical meaning and would have
been persuasive for Absalom, the biblical prince.
In convincing Absalom of his messianic role, Achitophel portrays David as
an old man with declining powers and as a fallen Lucifer:
Had thus old David, from whose loins you spring,
Not dared, when Fortune called him, to be king,
At Gath an exile he might still remain,
And heaven's anointing oil had been in vain.
Let his successful youth your hopes engage;
But shun the example of declining age;
Behold him setting in western skies,
The shadows lengthening as the vapors rise.
He is not now, as when on Jordan's sand
The joyful people thronged to see him land,
Covering the beach, and blackening all the strand;
But, like the Prince of Angels, from his height,
Comes tumbling downward with diminished light. (ll. 262-274)
There is a great deal of irony in this, warning of Achitophel's deceptive
persuasion. Hoping to convince Absalom of the practicality of a "pleasing
rape upon the crown" (l 474), Achitophel associates David's old age with
his supposed political impotence. Achitophel attempts to remove the
kingship and the question of secession from the authority of Heaven and
the law of God by falsifying the account of David's return from exile.
According to Achitophel, David was called from Gath by fortune; according
to the Bible, he was called from exile by god and anointed by Heaven.
Achitophel's argument makes the sanctity of heaven dependent on the
arbitrary role of fortune's wheel, whose prizes must be grabbed. In the
context of biblical history, that ethic obviously contradicts the moral
code and world order implied by God's written law.
The end of Achitophel's description is the simile "like the Prince of
Angels," used to epitomize David's decline. Achitophel chooses this image
to contrast the descending, faltering light of David's kingship with the
rising royal planet of Absalom's aspirations; but the use of this simile
reveals more than the wordy resemblance. By identifying Godlike David
with Satan, Achitophel joins forces with the devil himself as a defamer
of God.
As the picture of David comes to a close, Achitophel characterizes
David's impotance more subtly. Asserting that David is powerless to
resist Absalom's claim to the throne, Achitophel asks, "What strength can
he to your designs oppose, / Naked of friends, and round beset with
foes?" (l. 279-80). The second line of the couplet alludes to Samson and
suggests the description, from Milton, of Samson being blind among his
enemies:
Betray'd, Captiv'd, and both my eyes put out,
Made of my enemies the scorn and gaze;
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
Blind among enemies, O worse than chains,
Dungeon, or beggary, or decrepit age! (Samson Agonisties ll. 33-34,
68-69)
There are two ways of reading this allusion back into Achitophel's
portrait of David. The most obvious is that Achitophel unknowingly
predicts the final triumph of David as a Samson figure who wreaks havoc
on his enemies and asserts the force of God's law.
especially Christ among enemies and false friends. That relationship also
suggests the final victory of God over Satan and all antichrists.
Moreover, David as paralleled with Samson, given the typical relationship
that both Old Testament figures bear to Christ, plays off nicely against
David's own reference to Absalom as a false Samson, a pretend Messiah:
If my young Samson will pretend a call
To shake the column, let him share the fall. (l 955-56)
The couplet works in two ways, characterizing Absalom's revolt and
messianic claim as a 'fall' and ironically opposing it to the true
messianic 'call' and 'fall' to sacrifice and death which Samson, as type
of Christ, exemplifies. The words of Achitophel and the drama of his
temptation of Absalom characterize the two figures and confirm the
original relationship that has been established between David and God.
Throughout the poem that relationship is reconfirmed by association, by
direct assertion, and by the fallen characters' version of what is
asserted to be the true order of things. Those reconfirmations of David's
relationship with God - especially the increasing emphasis on David's
kingly role - work to transform David from private father to public king.
Once more the godlike David was restored,
And willing nations knew their lawful lord. (l. 1030-31)
2
A Son's Love for His Father
A son’s love for his father is sometimes not acknowledged until he is an adult. Children often become so wrapped up in their own tasks and obligations that they take for granted the simple acts of loving support given to them by their parents. And parents sometimes feel scared that obvious signs of love and emotion will scare off a child, so they just do all they can to make the child’s life run smoothly and try to fade into the background when it comes to tender moments. In the poem “Those Winter Sundays,” Robert Hayden uses figurative language and other literary devices to show a father’s love for his son as well as the son’s realization of that love.
The cold that Hayden describes in the house is a reoccurring hardship that the father must face in his life. “Sundays too my father got up early and put on his clothes in the blue black cold,” (lines 1-2, stanza 1). The father woke up early on his treasured time off from work to make sure that the house was warm for his son. The cold is described as if it were a tangible item causing the reader to be drawn in to the poem. “No one ever thanked him.” (line 5, stanza 1). This quote illustrates the fact that the father did this not for praise or to make himself look better in the eyes of his son, but because he would rather compromise his own comfort and enjoyment then have his son start the day off in the cold.
Hayden uses figurative language to bring alive the cold and to make it seem like more of an enemy for the father. “fearing the chronic angers of that house,” (line 4, stanza 2). The son is speaking of the dreaded cold, which he wishes that he did not have to face just as much as the father. It shows that the father was really making a contribution towards the happiness of the son by making the effort to rid the house of it. “…and hear the cold splintering, breaking.” (line 1, stanza 2). In this line, Hayden uses imagery to represent the fire that the father builds which helps to defeat the cold. The splintering and breaking are the sounds of the logs being burnt and, as the son finds later, the cold dying.
Flashback is used to show the true reason behind the father’s acts and the son’s subsequent comprehension of his father’s true feelings. “…driven out the cold and polished my good shoes as well. What did I know, what did I know of love’s austere and lonely offices?” (lines 2-5, stanza 3). The son realizes here that his father did the things that he had always simply thought of as done. He looks back and sees how much his father must have done for him without being acknowledged.
Throughout the poem, Hayden uses the imagery and other forms of figurative language as well as flashback techniques and a consistent setting to paint a picture for the reader about the relationship between the father and son. He describes how the father shows his affection for his son and how the son takes that in. At the end of the poem, the son contemplates his father’s motives and finds the true emotion behind the father’s actions.
3
Father and Son Relationship in Hamlet
Hamlet, of the play, Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, is a young man with many distinctive characteristics. He is the loving and beloved son of Hamlet, the deceased King of Denmark. He is talented in many ways, as actor, athlete, and scholar. Prince Hamlet draws upon many of his talents as he goes through a remarkable metamorphosis, changing from an average, responsible, young Prince to an apparently mad, raging son intent upon avenging his father’s untimely death.
In the beginning of Hamlet, the Prince behaves as any normal person would following the death of a loved one. Not only is this a loved one, but an extra special someone; it is his loving father whom he adored. Hamlet is grief stricken, depressed, and even angry that his mother remarried so soon after his father’s death. Having witnessed how his father had treated his mother with great love and respect, Hamlet cannot understand how his mother could shorten the grieving period so greatly to marry someone like Uncle Claudius. He is incapable of rationalizing her deeds and he is obsessed by her actions.
Throughout the play Hamlet is in constant conflict with himself. An appearance of a ghost claiming to be his father, “I am thy father’s spirit”(I.v.14) aggravates his grief, nearly causing him to commit suicide and leaving him deeply disgusted and angered. Upon speaking with his ghost-father, Hamlet learns that his uncle-stepfather killed Hamlet the King. “The serpent that did sting thy father’s life Now wears his crown”(I.v.45-46) Hamlet is beside himself and becomes obsessed with plotting and planning revenge for the death of his father.
Hamlet struggles constantly, trying to decide how he should go about avenging the loss of his father to his deceitful uncle-stepfather. Planning to kill him isn’t easy. Hamlet is given many opportunities to kill Claudius, but keeps stalling for time to be certain the ghost had spoken the truth about the murder. Finally, Hamlet decides upon a plan. “the play’s the thing/Wherein I’ll catch the conscience of the King”(II.ii.612-613). He will stage a performance for the King that would actually be a reenactment of his father’s murder. The play he chooses to reenact is entitled "The Murder of Gonzago" with a few changes made to accommodate Hamlet’s new lines and actions reflecting Claudius murdering his father. Upon seeing Claudius’s crazy behavior during and following Hamlet’s play, Hamlet realizes that his ghost-father had spoken the truth. This provides all the reassurance needed for Hamlet to carry out his plot to kill Claudius.
Hamlet appears insane throughout the play, but only to the unwary eye. “As I perchance hereafter shall think meet To put an antic position on”(I.v.196-197). He has put on this act to throw off his uncle’s spies. Though Hamlet is obviously intelligent, his character uses his talents as he evolves through many changes from a normal young prince to a grief-stricken, loving son of a beloved father to an apparently madman. Any son who possesses such intense feelings and goes to such great lengths to avenge his father bears testimony to an endearing father-son relationship. A son must have utmost respect and undying love for his father to carry out such a vigorous retaliation. Hamlet gives his life in the pursuit of justice, as he knows it. What more could a ghost ask of anyone?
4
The Father and Son Relationship in Song of Solomon

The book called Song of Solomon, by Toni Morrison, deals with many real life issues, most of which are illustrated by the relationships between different family members.

One archetypal relationship that Morrison includes in her book is the father:son relationship. Although it is obvious that Morrison does talk about this topic, it is not so obvious what she is trying to say about it. So, one might ask, how does the author establish the father:son relationships throughout Song of Solomon and do they fit some sort of archetype? To answer a question such as this, it would be beneficial to examine the actual father:son relationships throughout the book.

One established father:son relationships that is significant to this issue is the one between Milkman and Macon. From the start, Macon objected to Milkman even being born; he forced Ruth to do things to her body that could possibly kill the fetus. With a little help from Pilate, however, Milkman was allowed into the world.

Macon, perhaps instigated by never having a mother and seeing his own father killed, has always appeared to be a cold and unforgiving parent even to his other children besides Milkman, but since Macon heard that his son¹s nickname was ³Milkman² he has seen him as a symbol of his disgust for his wife and lost a lot of respect for his son and became even colder towards him. The only time Macon did spend time with Milkman, he spent it boasting about his own great upbringing, warning him to stay away from Pilate and telling him about the embarrassing actions of Ruth. This is the manner in which Morrison establishes the relationship between Macon and Milkman in the first part of the book.

As Milkman grows up, he recognizes the emotional distance between his father and himself. He goes his own way with a few skirmishes here and there and later he even manages to hit his own father. As Macon and Milkman grow apart and go their separate ways, Milkman doesn¹t even think twice about it and just continues on with his life as if nothing was different.

Near the end of the book Milkman seems to change his view of his father, with some help from the positive memories of the old men in the passage. Milkman grew up thinking that his father was a cold-hearted, hot tempered control freak who was only interested in gaining money and property. He came to realize that although there was some truth to what he thought, Macon was not inhuman. This is displayed in the passage when it states, ³His own father¹s words came back to him:
ŒI worked right alongside my father. Right alongside him.²
Even though Macon was against Milkman¹s birth, he came to cherish his only son in his own way. Probably under the impression that showing affection was a sign of a weak man, Macon held back what feelings he had for his son.

Milkman¹s feelings about his father¹s shows of affection are described when Morrison writes,
³Milkman thought then that his father was boasting of his manliness as a child. Now he knew he had been saying something else.²

One of the few good memories that Macon had of his father was spending time working alongside his father. Milkman finally figured out that Macon¹s description of his time spent working with his father were meant to as a show of affection for Milkman and to cause Milkman to see the similarities between Macon¹s relationship with his father and Milkman¹s relationship with Macon. Milkman¹s revelation is explained,
³That he loved his father; had an intimate relationship with him; that his father loved him, trusted him, and found him worthy of working Œright alongside¹ him.²
He most likely remembers gaining a great amount of respect for his father by learning and watching how his father made a living. Milkman now saw that all those times that he spent with Macon down in the workshop and being taught how to run a business were his father¹s mild way of showing love.

When Macon would tell Milkman about how he worked right alongside his father, he wasn¹t bragging about how masculine he was when he was little, he was attempting to describe the only real time he ever had an intimate relationship with his father. Macon shared what he had with his father with his son. Milkman now realized that there was some substance to his relationship with his father and that it wasn¹t completely disfunctional.
It is not clear whether Toni Morrison intended this part of the storyline to fit an archetype, but no matter what she intended, it does. It is the common story of two related characters who never really appreciate each other, or do appreciate each other but separate and never really discover the true value of their relationship with the other character until it is too late can be found in this book.

利用DNA进行亲子鉴定,只要作十几至几十个DNA位点作检测,如果全部一样,就可以确定亲子关系,如果有3个以上的位点不同,则可排除亲子关系,有一两个位点不同,则应考虑基因突变的可能,加做一些位点的检测进行辨别.DNA亲子鉴定,否定亲子关系的准确率几近100%,肯定亲子关系的准确率可达到99.99%.
就算打官司你也没话好说.

最后写洪水退了以后,一个老太太来祭奠两个人,一个是她的丈夫,一个是她的儿子.故事到这里戛然而止,直到这时人们才恍然大悟,知道了“老汉”和“小伙子”的关系.这虽让人感到在“意料之外”,但联系前文仔细想想,又觉得在“情理之中”.这样安排结构,达到了震撼人心的艺术效果.

Father-daughter relationship
Father and son relationship
mother-daughter relationship
sisters'relationship
brothers'relationship

elationship between them

1.本文作者叙述了父亲与自己,自己与儿子之间那种亲近、温馨、平等的关系

姑侄关系