我用的怀特检验法得到了如下的结果,不太懂到底有没有异方差

liwenhao212022-10-04 11:39:542条回答

我用的怀特检验法得到了如下的结果,不太懂到底有没有异方差
White Heteroskedasticity Test:x05x05x05x05
x05x05x05x05
F-statisticx051.804797x05 Probabilityx05x050.116540
Obs*R-squaredx058.821886x05 Probabilityx05x050.116383
x05x05x05x05
x05x05x05x05
Test Equation:x05x05x05x05
Dependent Variable:RESID^2x05x05x05x05
Method:Least Squaresx05x05x05x05
Date:03/22/12 Time:16:59x05x05x05x05
Sample:2001M01 2011M12x05x05x05x05
Included observations:132x05x05x05x05
x05x05x05x05
Variablex05Coefficientx05Std.Errorx05t-Statisticx05Prob.
x05x05x05x05
Cx054.06E-05x058.75E-06x054.642932x050.0000
X1x052.81E-05x050.000759x050.037018x050.9705
X1^2x05-0.020096x050.014287x05-1.406535x050.1620
X1*X2x050.013770x050.010730x051.283240x050.2018
X2x050.000148x050.000171x050.864169x050.3891
X2^2x05-0.003621x050.002444x05-1.481606x050.1409
x05x05x05x05
R-squaredx050.066832x05 Mean dependent varx05x053.34E-05
Adjusted R-squaredx050.029802x05 S.D.dependent varx05x055.48E-05
S.E.of regressionx055.40E-05x05 Akaike info criterionx05x05-16.77194
Sum squared residx053.67E-07x05 Schwarz criterionx05x05-16.64091
Log likelihoodx051112.948x05 F-statisticx05x051.804797
Durbin-Watson statx050.683177x05 Prob(F-statistic)x05x050.116540

已提交,审核后显示!提交回复

共2条回复
感谢荆纪ww 共回答了23个问题 | 采纳率87%
自由度是(6-1)=5 然后自己选定一个显著性水平比如0.05 查表 如果Obs*R-squared=8.821886,如果你查表查到的卡方值大于8.821886 那就存在异方差 反之不存在
1年前
板板942 共回答了3个问题 | 采纳率
F-statistic1.804797 Probability0.116540
Obs*R-squared8.821886 Probability0.116383
不是结果中有这个么?
Probability=0.116383 说明在0.1的显著性水平下 异方差不存在。
1年前

相关推荐

我不太会用Eviews进行异方差检验,我用的怀特检验法得到了如下图的结果,不太懂到底有没有异方差
我不太会用Eviews进行异方差检验,我用的怀特检验法得到了如下图的结果,不太懂到底有没有异方差
White Heteroskedasticity Test:x05x05x05x05
x05x05x05x05
F-statisticx050.893835x05 Probabilityx05x050.494001
Obs*R-squaredx054.616402x05 Probabilityx05x050.464462
x05x05x05x05
x05x05x05x05
Test Equation:x05x05x05x05
Dependent Variable:RESID^2x05x05x05x05
Method:Least Squaresx05x05x05x05
Date:03/21/12 Time:14:54x05x05x05x05
Sample:2008M01 2011M12x05x05x05x05
Included observations:48x05x05x05x05
x05x05x05x05
Variablex05Coefficientx05Std.Errorx05t-Statisticx05Prob.
x05x05x05x05
Cx052.38E-05x059.61E-06x052.475451x050.0174
Xx05-0.000598x050.000555x05-1.076557x050.2878
X^2x050.006291x050.007679x050.819168x050.4173
X*X2x05-0.002842x050.006594x05-0.431072x050.6686
X2x050.000183x050.000114x051.604567x050.1161
X2^2x05-0.000273x050.001543x05-0.177061x050.8603
x05x05x05x05
R-squaredx050.096175x05 Mean dependent varx05x051.18E-05
Adjusted R-squaredx05-0.011423x05 S.D.dependent varx05x051.61E-05
S.E.of regressionx051.62E-05x05 Akaike info criterionx05x05-19.11210
Sum squared residx051.10E-08x05 Schwarz criterionx05x05-18.87820
Log likelihoodx05464.6903x05 F-statisticx05x050.893835
Durbin-Watson statx051.630728x05 Prob(F-statistic)x05x050.494001
杜嘟1年前4
轻烟拭情 共回答了14个问题 | 采纳率85.7%
怀特检验看n*R^2与相应卡方分布临界值(x^2(r))的大小.
n为样本容量,R^2为相关系数,x为卡方符号,r为辅助方程中解释变量个数.
X
X^
X*X2
X2
X2^2
由此看辅助方程中解释变量个数共5个,所以你去查卡方分布表,查表得,在5%显著性水平(如果你的问题所取得显著性水平不是5%,那就换成你的显著性水平再查)下,此临界值为11.072.比较11.072与n*R^2的大小(样本容量自己数数),前者大,则没异方差,否则有.
您好!我不太会用Eviews进行异方差检验,我用的怀特检验法得到了如下图的结果,不太懂到底有没有异方差
您好!我不太会用Eviews进行异方差检验,我用的怀特检验法得到了如下图的结果,不太懂到底有没有异方差
White Heteroskedasticity Test:

F-statistic2.791081 Probability0.075217
Obs*R-squared8.193354 Probability0.084747


Test Equation:
Dependent Variable: RESID^2
Method: Least Squares
Date: 01/05/12 Time: 16:00
Sample: 1994 2010
Included observations: 17

VariableCoefficient Std. Err t-Statistic Prob.

C478.2814 20146.31 0.023740 0.9814
X1-0.2916456.359985 -0.0458560.9642
X1^20.000285 0.000251 1.1345790.2787
X2-18.7784172.22224 -0.2600090.7993
X2^2-0.0206940.024121 -0.8579550.4077

R-squared 0.481962 Mean dependent var7621.512
Adjusted R-squared0.309283 S.D. dependent var11733.10
S.E. of regression9751.312 Akaike info criterion21.44812
Sum squared resid1.14E+09 Schwarz criterion 21.69318
Log likelihood-177.3090 F-statistic2.791081
Durbin-Watson stat2.199710 Prob(F-statistic)0.075217
tobyzhou1年前2
d0x0b 共回答了21个问题 | 采纳率90.5%
我也刚好在做这个噢,用N*R^2得出卡方值,在你这里就是17* 0.481962=8.193354,然后查表,你这里是自由度为4,如果在显著性水平为0.05的情况下卡方临界值为9.4877,临界值大于你的卡方值,所以应该是认为不存在异方差的.
eviews检验中的White Heteroskedasticity Test:怀特检验法得到了如下图的结果,
eviews检验中的White Heteroskedasticity Test:怀特检验法得到了如下图的结果,
White Heteroskedasticity Test:x05x05x05x05
x05x05x05x05
F-statisticx052.006239x05 Probabilityx05x050.172236
Obs*R-squaredx0511.34509x05 Probabilityx05x050.182902
x05x05x05x05
x05x05x05x05
Test Equation:x05x05x05x05
Dependent Variable:RESID^2x05x05x05x05
Method:Least Squaresx05x05x05x05
Date:04/15/12 Time:13:05x05x05x05x05
Sample:1992 2008x05x05x05x05
Included observations:17x05x05x05x05
x05x05x05x05
Variablex05Coefficientx05Std.Errorx05t-Statisticx05Prob.
x05x05x05x05
Cx05-8229434.x0514051993x05-0.585642x050.5743
INCOMEx05356.3817x05115.6892x053.080509x050.0151
INCOME^2x05-0.012587x050.004074x05-3.089806x050.0149
Ix0514134437x057961755.x051.775292x050.1138
I^2x05-41937014x0539759822x05-1.054759x050.3223
Kx05209113.4x05228768.3x050.914084x050.3874
K^2x05-700.2938x051025.451x05-0.682913x050.5139
CPIx05-133312.9x05201010.9x05-0.663212x050.5258
CPI^2x05462.0425x05868.4004x050.532062x050.6091
x05x05x05x05
R-squaredx050.667358x05 Mean dependent varx05x0586081.71
Adjusted R-squaredx050.334717x05 S.D.dependent varx05x05127540.4
S.E.of regressionx05104028.2x05 Akaike info criterionx05x0526.24776
Sum squared residx058.66E+10x05 Schwarz criterionx05x0526.68888
Log likelihoodx05-214.1060x05 F-statisticx05x052.006239
Durbin-Watson statx052.869633x05 Prob(F-statistic)x05x050.172236
handushu1年前1
㊣咖啡㊣ 共回答了14个问题 | 采纳率100%
不存在异方差
我用的怀特检验法得到了如下图的结果,不太懂到底有没有异方差?要是有怎么办?
我用的怀特检验法得到了如下图的结果,不太懂到底有没有异方差?要是有怎么办?
White Heteroskedasticity Test:x05x05x05x05
x05x05x05x05
F-statisticx0515.95796x05 Probabilityx05x050.000560
Obs*R-squaredx0510.41159x05 Probabilityx05x050.005485
x05x05x05x05
x05x05x05x05
Test Equation:x05x05x05x05
Dependent Variable:RESID^2x05x05x05x05
Method:Least Squaresx05x05x05x05
Date:06/23/13 Time:15:57x05x05x05x05
Sample:1 14x05x05x05x05
Included observations:14x05x05x05x05
x05x05x05x05
Variablex05Coefficientx05Std.Errorx05t-Statisticx05Prob.
x05x05x05x05
Cx051379419.x051207282.x051.142582x050.2775
X1x05-266.8774x05246.6078x05-1.082194x050.3023
X1^2x050.025276x050.009429x052.680614x050.0214
x05x05x05x05
R-squaredx050.743685x05 Mean dependent varx05x052683624.
Adjusted R-squaredx050.697082x05 S.D.dependent varx05x053916094.
S.E.of regressionx052155339.x05 Akaike info criterionx05x0532.19220
Sum squared residx055.11E+13x05 Schwarz criterionx05x0532.32914
Log likelihoodx05-222.3454x05 F-statisticx05x0515.95796
Durbin-Watson statx051.516151x05 Prob(F-statistic)x05x050.000560
雄军1年前1
geimj 共回答了21个问题 | 采纳率81%
你看F检验了 P值只有0.000560 那肯定是显著了 就是说有异方差 虽然t不是很显著但是联合起来的F是显著地
所以有异方差
办法很多啊
你可以取对数缩小数据的scale 从而减少异方差
或者做FGLS啊 feasible general least square
用Heteroskedasticity consistent 统计量啊