The Winners Club is a bank account specially designed for te

不加s 时,“我们”是作为一个整体参加的,所以胜利者是我们这一方.例如：中国篮球队获得胜利时,中国球员可以说 we are the winner
加s时,这里的“我们”是按个体算的,例如：在北京奥运会上,we are the winners（我们都是胜利者

simply 修饰的不是后面的名词哦
胜利者简单地说就是那些愿意比别人工作的多的人.

等等，我看看

小题1:C
小题2:C
小题3:C
小题4:D

however后跟从句.所以不对.其实意思也不对,但是不好解释.
B和D呢应该连一起.no matter how much rapid progress
所以选C.其实C也不好.但是这里面只能选C

top是最高的意思,division是部的意思
整句话：他们是初中部的前三名

我的回答是：星期五第三健康午餐的赢家来这白色屋子里进行挑战

如果没有被安置于较高级的项目中,那些因具有创造性的成就而获得MacArthur 奖项的人中,很少有人会对他们的大学前的教育给以褒奖.
————

翻译：
给获胜者颁奖.

语言点：
not.but.不是.而是.
those 为先行词时,指人时关系代词用who,不用that

其实选 B 或选 C 都可以
each one 的意思是 one by one,one after the other 每一个,一个接一个
everyone 的意思是 all of the ones in the group 群里所有成员/部分
因为奖（品）通常是一个接一个给出的,所以 B 是最佳选择.
我是加拿大人,前英语老师.

2004年,十个诺贝尔科学类获奖者中有七个是美国人.去年,十个中有五个是美国人.
为什么美国科学家会这么得成功?专家分析说主要还是钱的原因:研究工作代价昂贵,而美国科学家拥有大量的研究经费.
另外,据诺贝尔委员会委员Anders Liljas讲:美国大学通常拥有更具创造性的环境,而且他们的科学家经常互相交流,而不是"独立钻研".

winners（主语） do（谓语） what losers don't want to do （宾语从句）
赢家做的（往往）是输家所不想做的事

奖品获得者
或奖金获得者
全句意思是“他们是奖品获得者.”
楼上看清楚了,这是一个名词词组.上面两个都说成动词词组了

小题1:B
小题2:C
小题3:B
小题4:D

caring for our earth environment
the biggest threat to our environment today is the way we,as human beings,see our environment,how we see our environment shapes our whole world.
most of us see everything as independent from one another.But the reality is that everything is part of one interconnected,interrelated whole.For example,
a tree may appear isolated,but in fact it affects and is affected by everything in its environment--sunshine,rain,wind,birds,minerals,other plants and trees,you ,me.The tree shapes the wind that blows around it; it is also shaped by that wind.Look at the relationship between the tree and its environment and you will see the future of the tree.
The "Matthew effect" denotes the phenomenon that "the rich get richer and the poor get poorer" and can be observed in various different contexts where "rich" and "poor" can take different meanings.The effect takes its name from a line spoken by "the Master" in Jesus' parable of the talents in the biblical Gospel of Matthew:
"For unto every one that hath shall be given,and he shall have abundance:but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath." (Matthew XXV:29,King James Version.)
Sociology of science
In sociology of science,"Matthew effect" was a term coined by Robert K.Merton to describe how,among other things,eminent scientists will often get more credit than a comparatively unknown researcher,even if their work is similar; it also means that credit will usually be given to researchers who are already famous:for example,a prize will almost always be awarded to the most senior researcher involved in a project,even if all the work was done by a graduate student.
[edit] Examples
As credit is valued in science,specific claims of the Matthew effect are contentious.
20th century mathematician John von Neumann is frequently called the "father of game theory" or the "father of the computer," even though his influential publications were sometimes restatements of the ideas of his collaborators (see the First Draft of a Report on the EDVAC).
There was a controversy involving George Sudarshan and the Nobel Prize in Physics for 2005.Several physicists wrote a letter to the Swedish Academy,protesting that Sudarshan should have been awarded a share of the Prize for the Sudarshan-Glauber representation (or Sudarshan diagonal representation) in quantum optics,for which Roy J.Glauber won his share of the prize.Because the terms of Alfred Nobel's will restrict the number of Nobel Prize winners to three in a given year,the Nobel Committee has often been criticized for allegedly ignoring scientists who did seminal work on a topic while awarding a prize to other scientists for the same topic.
For the first time,Sudarshan himself has broken his silence over the Nobel controversy.Speaking to HT,he expressed frustration at the way Indians are ignored for top science honours.Speaking to the Indian daily ,he said:
"The 2005 Nobel prize for Physics was awarded for my work,but I wasn鈥檛 the one to get it.Each one of the discoveries that the Nobel was given for were based on my research."
In algorithmic information theory,the notion of Kolmogorov complexity (also known as Kolomogorov-Chaitin complexity) is named after the famous Russian mathematician Andrey Kolmogorov.Li and Vitanyi,in "An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications" (p.84),write:
Ray Solomonoff [...] introduced [what is now known as] 'Kolmogorov complexity' in a long journal paper in 1964.[...] This makes Solomonoff the first inventor and raises the question whether we should talk about Solomonoff complexity.[...] (Associating Kolmogorov's name with the complexity may also be an example of the "Matthew Effect" first noted in the Gospel according to Matthew,25:29-30,"For to every one who has more will be given,and he will have in abundance; but from him who has not,even what he has will be taken away.And cast the worthless servant into the outer darkness; there men will weep and gnash their teeth.")
There are many uncontroversial examples of the Matthew effect in mathematics,where a concept is due to one mathematician (and well-documented as such),but is attributed to a later (possibly much later),more famous mathematician who worked on it.
For instance,the Poincar茅 disk model and Poincar茅 half-plane model of hyperbolic space are both named for Henri Poincar茅,but were introduced by Eugenio Beltrami in 1868 (when Poincar茅 was 14 and had not as yet contributed to hyperbolic geometry).
[edit] Matilda effect
The Matilda effect is the corollary to the Matthew effect:the work of women in science is often neglected.The Matilda effect,named after early feminist Matilda Joslyn Gage,was postulated by historian of science Margaret Rossiter in 1993.
[edit] Education
In education the term Matthew effect has been adopted by Keith Stanovich,a psychologist who has done extensive research on reading and language disabilities.Stanovich used the term to describe a phenomenon that has been observed in research on how new readers acquire the skills to read:early success in acquiring reading skills usually leads to later successes in reading as the learner grows,while failing to learn to read before the third or fourth year of schooling may be indicative of life-long problems in learning new skills.This is because children who fall behind in reading,read less,increasing the gap between them and their peers.Later,when students need to "read to learn" (where before they were learning to read) their reading difficulty creates difficulty in most other subjects.In this way they fall further and further behind in school,dropping out at a much higher rate than their peers.Because of this they are not able to tap into education as a way to improve their lives,essentially becoming poorer while others become richer.
In the words of Keith Stanovich:Slow reading acquisition has cognitive,behavioral,and motivational consequences that slow the development of other cognitive skills and inhibit performance on many academic tasks.In short,as reading develops,other cognitive processes linked to it track the level of reading skill.Knowledge bases that are in reciprocal relationships with reading are also inhibited from further development.The longer this developmental sequence is allowed to continue,the more generalized the deficits will become,seeping into more and more areas of cognition and behavior.Or to put it more simply -- and sadly -- in the words of a tearful nine-year-old,already falling frustratingly behind his peers in reading progress,"Reading affects everything you do" (Adams,1990,pp.59-60)"
[edit] Social policy
In social policy the term was introduced by Herman Deleeck.It refers to the phenomenon,widely observed across advanced welfare states,that the middle classes tend to be the main beneficiaries of social benefits and services,even if these are primarily targeted at the poor.
The term is also used in a similar way in adult education to describe the distribution of adult learning across populations.In this case it refers to the phenomenon whereby adults who have the highest levels of initial education are most likely to engage in structured continuing learning,while those with the lowest levels of initial education are the least likely to engage in structured learning.

生活中没有赢家,只有幸存者

你打错了一个字,不是bo,应该是be
It's simple to be a winner,work with winners.
与胜者一起很简单,要和胜者并肩工作.

财富的分配是不均匀的,从当今繁荣中获利的赢家们大多常常在警卫森严的深宅大院里急于加强他们已经高高在上的位置.
all too often:大多太常常是这样.和too .to没什么关系

I understand that your yesterday experience might seem so overwhelming that it just feels awkward to try anything that is said to be "good for you" or "should be done".You feel so exhausted that you never get it right.Now,I think life as something so wicked that you can never win it.And it is so full of delight ( I am not saying "full of praise and comfort") to live a life by my own perseverance.You might ask,amigo,"But why are you so sure?" Because I know I can only feel happy and willing to live if only my heart decides to be happy and decides to live.No matter what is with me,or where I am,this is all I have:my willingness to live on.From the bottom of my heart,and with all I am gifted to give,I will choose to live and to give.
You don't have to beg for any forgiveness.As long as you decide to give to your friend,you are forgiven.As long as you decide to move on and live on,you are forgiven.Who cares those ideas that tells you "you should do this!" and "you should do that" and "you should win,and never lose"?As long as you decide to give,you are forgiven.As long as you are forgiven,all the praise will not be anything of the others,nor the wounds,nor the pains,nor the gains.All is yours to enjoy!I have no doubt that you eager for a feeling of forgiveness.And today,I have no doubt that you WILL be forgiven,right from this moment,for you have all that life has to offer waiting for you to achieve.
Search these keywords below in Baidu or Youku,and watch the video of that godsend.
"Nick Vujicic"
Cheer up!and be yourself.Remember you are loved and you are forgiven,as long as you choose to feel the beauty of living your own life.Fingers crox for you!

小题1:B
小题1:C
小题1:D
小题1:D

略

set up,有设计陷害的意思,这里的意思应该是：他们不会令自己处于受损失的境地的.

for.如果我不采访胜出者,我没法得到足够信息.得到足够信息是为了我的报告.所以用for.
above,在.上.等吊在桌子上方.

胜者在日常生活中就形成了（为成功打基础的习惯）,而败者却不愿意如此.
更通俗的理成功总是垂青于有准备的人.

There are two kinds of people（主） in this world（状语.本句为there be结构）,winners and losers（同位语）.
Inside each and every one of you,at the very core of your being,（前面这些都是表语）is（系动词） a winner（主语） waiting to be awakened and unleashed upon the world（定语）.
本句为倒装句.

选 B 因为for是介词 所以后面要用宾格啊

针对你提的问题,一楼回答的不错.我再详细说一下宾语从句：
学习宾语从句并不难,只要你能过好下面的三道关：
第一关,选好连接词（也有人叫关联词）.
引导宾语从句的连接词,课本上写有三类,但从学习的角度看分为四类更为实用.
1．连词that：只起连接作用,在从句中不作句子成分,也无词汇意义,在口语中或非正式文体中常被省略.例如：1）He knew（that）he should work hard．
2）I am glad（that）you've passed the exam．
2．连词whether或if：它们起连接作用,在从句中不作句子成分,作“是否”解,口语中多用if.例如：3）Do you know whether he will ride here at 8 tomorrow morning?
4）Tom didn't know if／whether his grandpa liked the present．
作“是否”解的if和whether在具体用法上差别较大,同学们不易掌握.在宾语从句中用whether没有用if时受到那么多限制.例如：
5）He asked me whether or not I was coming．他问我是否要来.（该句中的whether不能换成if,因为if不能与or连用.）
3．连接代词who,whom ,whose,what,which：它们起连接作用,作句子成分,各有其自己的意义.例如：
6）The teacher asked the new student which class he was in?（武汉市）（which引导宾语从句,在从句中作定语,修饰class,意为“哪个”.）
7）Can you tell me whom he is waiting for?（天津市）
4．连接副词when,where,why,how：起连接作用,分别作时间、地点、原因、方式状语,各有其自己的意义.例如：
8）I wonder where he got so much money．对他从哪里弄到那么多钱我感到疑惑.（where在从句中作地点状语,修饰got,意为“哪里；什么地方”.）
9）He didn't tell me how old his friend was．（四川省）（how引导宾语从句,作程度状语,修饰old,意为“怎样；如何”等意.）
第二关,牢记宾语从句的语序是陈述句语序,即“连接词＋主语＋谓语＋其他”.这里特别强调的是,它的主语和谓语的语序是陈述句的语序,不是疑问句的倒装语序.例如：10）You must remember what your teacher said．
11）—Dad,do you know when the football game will start?
—In half an hour．（宁波市）
12）汉译英：你能不能告诉我,我们去看望谁?
误：Can you tell me who（m）do we have to see?
正：Can you tell me who（m）we have to see?
错句的错误出在宾语从句中误用了疑问句的结构——主语前加了个助动词do.因为我们已经习惯了特殊疑问句,如W hat time does the plane arrive in Paris?就顺口说出“Do you know what time does the plane arrive in Paris?”这种错误句子来.但是一旦我们注意了,我们不久就习惯于说“Do you know what time the plane arrives in Paris?”了.
第三关,注意时态的呼应.宾语从句中谓语动词的时态,常常受主句谓语时态的制约,这种现象称为“时态的呼应”.例如：
13）汉译英：我原以为你今天有空的.误：I thought（that）you are free today．
正：I thought（that）you would be free today．
错句中宾语从句用are很可能是因为有 today,但因为主句谓语是thought,所以从句谓语就该用过去将来时would be了.
这种时态的呼应,如果主句谓语是现在时或将来时,宾语从句的谓语时态不受限制,如上述例句2）,3）,7）,8）,10）,11）,12）.如果主句时态是过去时,宾语从句一般要随着改为相应的过去时（即一般过去时、过去进行时、过去完成时、过去将来时等）.例如：14）He thought he was working for the people．
15）I heard she had been to the Great W all．
16）John hoped that he would find a job soon．
但宾语从句如果表示定理法则、永恒真理等,则不变化：
17）The teacher told us that the earth moves around the sun．
巩固与检测请做下列2002年中考题：
1．In the bookshop,a reader asked the shop keeper _____Who Moved My Cheese was an interesting book．（北京市东城区）
A．that B．how C．what D．if
2．—I don't know _____ Mr．Green will come to see us．
—He will help us with our English．（杭州市）
A．why B．when C．how D．where
3．—We never know _____ the old m an is． —They say he is a teacher.A．what B．who C．which D．where
4．I was told _____ Bill Gates was thirteen he began to play with computers． A．that how B．how that C．when that D．that when
5．—Do you know _____ I'm going to see him． —Sorry,I don't know．（北京市海淀区） A．where does Mr．Li live B．where did Mr．Li live
C．where Mr．Li lives D．where Mr．Li lived
6．—W here do you think _____ he _____ the computer?
—Sorry,I have no idea．（南京市）
A．／；bought B．has；bought C．did；buy D．does；buy
7．I don't feel very well．Mum asked me _____this morning．（重庆市）
A.what the matter is B．what is wrong
C．what the matter was D．what wrong was
8．—Where is Jack?
—He is away to spend his holiday．He's gone either to Hangzhou or to Wuhan,but I'm not sure _____ ．（南昌市）
A．that B．which C．where D．there
Key:宾语从句与中考试题 1—4 D A A D 5—8 C A C C

there,men are still expected to be bresdwinners (who climbs)the corporate ladder.

问题是不是“It's simple to be a winner,work with winners.”该怎样理解?
和赢家们一起工作,成为赢家也就容易了.

你的部分理解是对的,climbing the corporate ladder是breadwinners的伴随状语,也就是breadwinners同时做的事,是指这些breadwinners同时也要事业在事业上有所成就.但是这的breadwinners主语其实就是men.
勉强可以看做A=B=C的意思,再加上英语想要通顺的话很多要意译.
你的语法分析是对的,意思上说得通比讲得明白更重要!成功一定属于做事认真的人,天天开心!

B
for 是介词，介词后的代词用宾格。

D

Who指代people的,最简单的说法是如果不用的话句子里会出现两个谓语,are和fail.

each of .中的 每一个
例句：
Each of our troubles is a steppingstone.
每一个困难都是你的踏脚石.
Each of them has a nice ring.
她们每人有一枚漂亮的戒指.
是这样的each后面加名词单数,但是each of后面加名词复数；因为of翻译成...之中的意思.
你看可以不,可以的话,请选为满意答案.希望对你有所帮助,请指出!

caring for our earth environment
the biggest threat to our environment today is the way we,as human beings,see our environment,how we see our environment shapes our whole world.
most of us see everything as independent from one another.But the reality is that everything is part of one interconnected,interrelated whole.For example,
a tree may appear isolated,but in fact it affects and is affected by everything in its environment--sunshine,rain,wind,birds,minerals,other plants and trees,you ,me.The tree shapes the wind that blows around it; it is also shaped by that wind.Look at the relationship between the tree and its environment and you will see the future of the tree.
The "Matthew effect" denotes the phenomenon that "the rich get richer and the poor get poorer" and can be observed in various different contexts where "rich" and "poor" can take different meanings.The effect takes its name from a line spoken by "the Master" in Jesus' parable of the talents in the biblical Gospel of Matthew:
"For unto every one that hath shall be given,and he shall have abundance:but from him that hath not shall be taken away even that which he hath." (Matthew XXV:29,King James Version.)
Sociology of science
In sociology of science,"Matthew effect" was a term coined by Robert K.Merton to describe how,among other things,eminent scientists will often get more credit than a comparatively unknown researcher,even if their work is similar; it also means that credit will usually be given to researchers who are already famous:for example,a prize will almost always be awarded to the most senior researcher involved in a project,even if all the work was done by a graduate student.
[edit] Examples
As credit is valued in science,specific claims of the Matthew effect are contentious.
20th century mathematician John von Neumann is frequently called the "father of game theory" or the "father of the computer," even though his influential publications were sometimes restatements of the ideas of his collaborators (see the First Draft of a Report on the EDVAC).
There was a controversy involving George Sudarshan and the Nobel Prize in Physics for 2005.Several physicists wrote a letter to the Swedish Academy,protesting that Sudarshan should have been awarded a share of the Prize for the Sudarshan-Glauber representation (or Sudarshan diagonal representation) in quantum optics,for which Roy J.Glauber won his share of the prize.Because the terms of Alfred Nobel's will restrict the number of Nobel Prize winners to three in a given year,the Nobel Committee has often been criticized for allegedly ignoring scientists who did seminal work on a topic while awarding a prize to other scientists for the same topic.
For the first time,Sudarshan himself has broken his silence over the Nobel controversy.Speaking to HT,he expressed frustration at the way Indians are ignored for top science honours.Speaking to the Indian daily ,he said:
"The 2005 Nobel prize for Physics was awarded for my work,but I wasn鈥檛 the one to get it.Each one of the discoveries that the Nobel was given for were based on my research."
In algorithmic information theory,the notion of Kolmogorov complexity (also known as Kolomogorov-Chaitin complexity) is named after the famous Russian mathematician Andrey Kolmogorov.Li and Vitanyi,in "An Introduction to Kolmogorov Complexity and Its Applications" (p.84),write:
Ray Solomonoff [...] introduced [what is now known as] 'Kolmogorov complexity' in a long journal paper in 1964.[...] This makes Solomonoff the first inventor and raises the question whether we should talk about Solomonoff complexity.[...] (Associating Kolmogorov's name with the complexity may also be an example of the "Matthew Effect" first noted in the Gospel according to Matthew,25:29-30,"For to every one who has more will be given,and he will have in abundance; but from him who has not,even what he has will be taken away.And cast the worthless servant into the outer darkness; there men will weep and gnash their teeth.")
There are many uncontroversial examples of the Matthew effect in mathematics,where a concept is due to one mathematician (and well-documented as such),but is attributed to a later (possibly much later),more famous mathematician who worked on it.
For instance,the Poincar茅 disk model and Poincar茅 half-plane model of hyperbolic space are both named for Henri Poincar茅,but were introduced by Eugenio Beltrami in 1868 (when Poincar茅 was 14 and had not as yet contributed to hyperbolic geometry).
[edit] Matilda effect
The Matilda effect is the corollary to the Matthew effect:the work of women in science is often neglected.The Matilda effect,named after early feminist Matilda Joslyn Gage,was postulated by historian of science Margaret Rossiter in 1993.
[edit] Education
In education the term Matthew effect has been adopted by Keith Stanovich,a psychologist who has done extensive research on reading and language disabilities.Stanovich used the term to describe a phenomenon that has been observed in research on how new readers acquire the skills to read:early success in acquiring reading skills usually leads to later successes in reading as the learner grows,while failing to learn to read before the third or fourth year of schooling may be indicative of life-long problems in learning new skills.This is because children who fall behind in reading,read less,increasing the gap between them and their peers.Later,when students need to "read to learn" (where before they were learning to read) their reading difficulty creates difficulty in most other subjects.In this way they fall further and further behind in school,dropping out at a much higher rate than their peers.Because of this they are not able to tap into education as a way to improve their lives,essentially becoming poorer while others become richer.
In the words of Keith Stanovich:Slow reading acquisition has cognitive,behavioral,and motivational consequences that slow the development of other cognitive skills and inhibit performance on many academic tasks.In short,as reading develops,other cognitive processes linked to it track the level of reading skill.Knowledge bases that are in reciprocal relationships with reading are also inhibited from further development.The longer this developmental sequence is allowed to continue,the more generalized the deficits will become,seeping into more and more areas of cognition and behavior.Or to put it more simply -- and sadly -- in the words of a tearful nine-year-old,already falling frustratingly behind his peers in reading progress,"Reading affects everything you do" (Adams,1990,pp.59-60)"
[edit] Social policy
In social policy the term was introduced by Herman Deleeck.It refers to the phenomenon,widely observed across advanced welfare states,that the middle classes tend to be the main beneficiaries of social benefits and services,even if these are primarily targeted at the poor.
The term is also used in a similar way in adult education to describe the distribution of adult learning across populations.In this case it refers to the phenomenon whereby adults who have the highest levels of initial education are most likely to engage in structured continuing learning,while those with the lowest levels of initial education are the least likely to engage in structured learning

你去派特森学学吧
我就在那学
我觉得还行

介词短语of what they imagine they should be做名词concept的同位语,全句意为“获胜者没有终生追求某种观念,即设想自己该是什么样子”.
提醒：what不能引导定语从句,这里的what从句是介词of的宾语从句.

swim

胜利者永不退缩,退缩者永无胜利.

eady

（ A ）The boys who ________ the loudest were the winners.
A.shouted B.shouting C.was shouting D.were shouted
（ B） The boys ________ the loudest were the winners.
A.shouted B.shouting C.was shouting D.were shouting

　　主句read on to find out
　　从句who the winners are

对.
AND前后联接并列2个成分,此句补充完整为
winners are not afraid to do their own thinking and are not afraid to use their own knowledge.
只是后句话中 are not afraid 省略了,你加进去翻译一下就明白了.

翻译是：胜利者在做失败者不想做的事.

“那些胜利者对于他们自己的表现持什么看法呢?”
然后指出个笔误,原文中的theri应该是their.

句子1
你们学校可能已停止区分胜利者和失败者,但是生活却没有.
句子2
善待那些无聊(令人厌烦)的人,因为最终你有可能为其中的某一个工作.

游戏中没有胜者和败者.（或者说：只是个游戏,没有胜败之分的.）

1.semi-final
2.independent
3.pre-president
4.under-control
5.subway
6.uniform
7.forecast
8.childlike

When did the winners receive the cup and the medals?
希望对你有所帮助,有不明白的再问吧