设方针A满足矩阵方程（A的平方）－A－2E＝0,证明A及A＋2E都可逆.

C

The common law forms a major part of the law of those countries of the world with a history as British territories or colonies. It is notable for its inclusion of extensive non-statutory law reflecting precedent derived from centuries of judgments by working jurists.
There are three important connotations to the term.
One is used to distinguish the authority that promulgated a particular proposition of law: for example, the United States typically has "statutes" enacted by a legislature, "regulations" promulgated by executive branch agencies pursuant to a delegation of rule-making authority from a legislature, and "common law" decisions issued by courts (or quasi-judicial tribunals within agencies) that discuss and decide the fine distinctions in statutes and regulations. See statutory law and non-statutory law.
The second distinguishes "common law" jurisdictions (most of which descend from the English legal system) that place great weight on such common law decisons, from "civil law" or "code" jurisdictions (many of which descend from the Napoleonic code in which the weight accorded judicial precedent is much less).
The third distinguishes "common law" (or just "law") from "equity". Until the beginning of the 20th Century, most common law jurisdictions had two parallel court systems, courts of "law" that could only award money damages and recognised only the legal owner of property, and courts of "equity" that recognised trusts of property and could issue injunctions, orders to do or stop doing something. Although the separate courts were merged long ago in most jurisdictions, or at least all courts were permitted to apply both law and equity, the distinction between law and equity remains important in (a) categorising and prioritising rights to property, (b) determining whether the Seventh Amendment's guarantee of a jury trial applies (a determination of a fact necessary to resolution of a "law" claim) or whether the issue can only be decided by a judge (issues of equity), and (c) in the principles that apply to the grant of equitable remedies by the courts.
Many important areas of law are governed primarily by common law. For example, in England and Wales and in most states of the United States, the basic law of contracts and torts does not exist in statute, but only in common law. In almost all areas of the law, statutes may give only terse statements of general principle, but the fine boundaries and definitions exist only in the common law. To find out what the law is, you have to locate precedential decisions on the topic, and reason from those decisions by analogy.
Contents [hide]
1 History of the common law
2 Common law legal systems
3 Basic principles of common law
4 Works on the common law
5 See also
6 External links
[edit]
History of the common law
Common law originally developed under the inquisitorial system in England from judicial decisions that were based in tradition, custom, and precedent. Such forms of legal institutions and culture bear resemblance to those which existed historically in continental Europe and other societies where precedent and custom have at times played a substantial role in the legal process, including Germanic law recorded in Roman historical chronicles. The form of reasoning used in common law is known as casuistry or case-based reasoning. The common law, as applied in civil cases (as distinct from criminal cases), was devised as a means of compensating someone for wrongful acts known as torts, including both intentional torts and torts caused by negligence, and as developing the body of law recognizing and regulating contracts. The type of procedure practised in common law courts is known as the adversarial system; this is also a development of the common law.
Before the institutional stability imposed on England by William the Conqueror in 1066, English residents, like those of many other societies, particularly the Germanic cultures of continental Europe, were governed by unwritten local customs that varied from community to community and were enforced in often arbitrary fashion. For example, courts generally consisted of informal public assemblies that weighed conflicting claims in a case and, if unable to reach a decision, might require an accused to test guilt or innocence by carrying a red-hot iron or snatching a stone from a cauldron of boiling water or some other "test" of veracity (trial by ordeal). If the defendant's wound healed within a prescribed period, he was set free as innocent; if not, execution usually followed.
In 1154, Henry II became the first Plantagenet king. Among many achievements, Henry institutionalized common law by creating a unified system of law "common" to the country through incorporating and elevating local custom to the national, ending local control and peculiarities, eliminating arbitrary remedies, and reinstating a jury system of citizens sworn on oath to investigate reliable criminal accusations and civil claims. The jury reached its verdict through evaluating common local knowledge, not necessarily through the presentation of evidence, a distinguishing factor from today's civil and criminal court systems.
Henry II's creation of a powerful and unified court system, which curbed somewhat the power of canonical (church) courts, brought him (and England) into conflict with the church, most famously, with Thomas Becket, the Archbishop of Canterbury. Things were resolved eventually, at least for a time, in Henry's favour when a group of his henchmen murdered Becket. For its part, the Church soon canonized Becket as a saint.
Thus, in English legal history, judicially-developed "common law" became the uniform authority throughout the realm several centuries before Parliament acquired the power to make laws.
As early as the 15th century, it became the practice that litigants who felt they had been cheated by the common-law system would petition the King in person. For example, they might argue that an award of damages (at common law) was not sufficient redress for a trespasser occupying their land, and instead request that the trespasser be evicted. From this developed the system of equity, administered by the Lord Chancellor, in the courts of chancery. By their nature, equity and law were frequently in conflict and litigation would frequently continue for years as one court countermanded the other, even though it was established by the 17th century that equity should prevail. A famous example is the fictional case of Jarndyce and Jarndyce in Bleak House, by Charles Dickens.
In England, courts of law and equity were combined by the Judicature Acts of 1873 and 1875, with equity being supreme in case of conflict. In the United States, parallel systems of law (providing money damages) and equity (fashioning a remedy to fit the situation) survived well into the 20th century in most jurisdictions. The United States federal courts separated law and equity until they were combined by the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure in 1937 - the same judges could hear either kind of case, but a given case could only pursue causes in law or in equity, which of course led to all kinds of problems when a given case required both money damages and injunctive relief. Delaware still has separate courts of law and equity, and in many states there are separate divisions for law and equity within one court.
[edit]
Common law legal systems
The common law constitutes the basis of the legal systems of: England and Wales, the Republic of Ireland, federal law in the United States and the states' laws (except Louisiana), federal law in Canada and the provinces' laws (except Quebec civil law), Australia, New Zealand, South Africa, India, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, Brunei, Pakistan, Singapore, Hong Kong, and many other generally English-speaking countries or Commonwealth countries. Essentially, every country which has been colonised at some time by Britain uses common law except those that had been colonized by other nations, such as Quebec (which follows French law to some extent) and South Africa (which follows Roman Dutch law), where the prior civil law system was retained to respect the civil rights of the local colonists. India's system of common law is also a mixture of English law and the local Hindu law.
The main alternative to the common law system is the civil law system, which is used in Continental Europe, and most of the rest of the world. The former Soviet Bloc and other Socialist countries used a Socialist law system.
The opposition between civil law and common law legal systems has become increasingly blurred, with the growing importance of jurisprudence (almost like case law but in name) in civil law countries, and the growing importance of statute law and codes in common law countries (for example, in matters of criminal law, commercial law (the Uniform Commercal Code in the early 1960's) and procedure (the Federal Rules of Evidence in the 1970's)).
Scotland is often said to use the civil law system but in fact it has a unique system that combines elements of an uncodified civil law dating back to the Corpus Juris Civilis with an element of common law long predating the Treaty of Union with England in 1707. Scots common law differs in that the use of precedents is subject to the courts seeking to discover the principle which justifies a law rather than to search for an example as a precedent and that the principles of natural justice and fairness have always formed a source of Scots Law. Comparable pluralistic legal systems operate in Quebec, Louisiana and South Africa. These systems are referred to as mixed legal systems.
The U.S. state of California has a system based on common law, but it has codified the law in the manner of the civil law jurisdictions. The reason for the enactment of the codes in California in the nineteenth century was to replace a pre-existing system based on Spanish civil law with a system based on common law, similar to that in most other states. California and a number of other Western states, however, have retained the concept of community property derived from civil law. The California courts have treated portions of the codes as an extension of the common-law tradition, subject to judicial development in the same manner as judge-made common law. (Most notably, in the case Li v. Yellow Cab Co., 13 Cal.3d 804 (1975), the California Supreme Court adopted the principle of comparative negligence in the face of a California Civil Code provision codifying the traditional common-law doctrine of contributory negligence.)
The state of New York, which also has a civil law history from its Dutch colonial days, also began a codification of its laws in the 19th century. The only part of this codification process that was considered complete is known as the Field Code applying to civil procedure. The original colony of New Netherlands was settled by the Dutch and the law was also Dutch. When the British captured pre-existing colonies they continued to allow the local settlers to keep their civil law. However, the Dutch settlers revolted against the English and the colony was recaptured by the Dutch. When the English finally regained control of New Netherlands -- as a punishment unique in the history of the British Empire -- they forced the English common law upon all the colonists, including the Dutch. This was problematic as the patroon system of land holding, based on the feudal system and civil law, continued to operate in the colony until it was abolished in the mid-nineteenth century. The influence of Roman Dutch law continued in the colony well into the late nineteenth century. The codification of a law of general obligations shows how remnants of the civil law tradition in New York continued on from the Dutch days.
[edit]
Basic principles of common law
Statutes which reflect English common law are understood always to be interpreted in light of the common law tradition, and so may leave a number of things unsaid because they are already understood from the point of view of pre-existing case law and custom. This can readily be seen in the area of criminal law, which while remaining largely governed by the common law in England, has been entirely codified in many US states. Codification is the process where a statute is passed with the intention of restating the common law position in a single document rather than creating new offences, so the common law remains relevant to their interpretation. This is why even today American law schools teach the common law of crime as practised in England in 1750, since the colonies (and subsequently the states) deviated from the common law as practised in England only after that date.
By contrast to the statutory codifications of common law, some laws are purely statutory, and may create a new cause of action beyond the common law. An example is the tort of wrongful death, which allows certain persons, usually a spouse, child or estate, to sue for damages on behalf of the deceased. There is no such tort in English common law; thus, any jurisdiction that lacks a wrongful death statute will not allow a lawsuit for the wrongful death of a loved one. Where a wrongful death statute exists, the damages or compensation available are limited to those outlined in the statute (typically, an upper limit on the amount of damages). Courts generally interpret statutes that create new causes of action narrowly -- that is, limited to their precise terms -- because the courts generally recognize the legislature as being supreme in deciding the reach of judge-made law unless such statute should violate some "second order" constitutional law provision (compare judicial activism).
Where a tort is rooted in common law, then all damages traditionally recognized historically for that tort may be sued for, whether or not there is mention of those damages in the current statutory law. For instance, a person who sustains bodily injury through the negligence of another may sue for medical costs, pain, suffering, loss of earnings or earning capacity, mental and/or emotional distress, loss of quality of life, disfigurement, and more. These damages need not be set forth in statute as they already exist in the tradition of common law. However, without a wrongful death statute, most of them are extinguished upon death.
[edit]
Works on the common law
The definitive historical treatise on the common law is Commentaries on the Laws of England, written by Sir William Blackstone and first published in 1765 - 1769. Since 1979 a facsimile edition of that first edition has been available in four paper-bound volumes. Today it has been superseded in the English part of the United Kingdom by Halsbury's Laws of England that covers both common and statutory English law.
While he was still on the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, and before being named to the U.S. Supreme Court, Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. published a short volume called The Common Law which remains a classic in the field. In the United States, the Corpus Juris Secundum is a compendium of the common law and its variations throughout the various state jurisdictions. The American Law Institute publishes Restatements of the common law which are often cited by American courts and lawyers when they need to invoke uncodified common law doctrines.
Scots common law covers matters including murder and theft, and has sources in custom, in legal writings and in previous court decisions. The legal writings used are called Institutional Texts and come mostly from the 17th, 18th and 19th centuries. Examples include Craig, Jus Feudale (1655) and Stair, The Institutions of the Law of Scotland (1681).
[edit]
See also
Arraignment
Civil law (legal system)
Common-law marriage
English law
Grand jury
Jury trial
List of legal topics
Scots law
[edit]

【八字方针】是中国共产党在开始全面建设社会主义时期提出的恢复与发展国民经济的方针.即“调整、巩固、充实、提高”的方针.

Identify external cooperation projects,according to its own conditions and characteristics,with the publication of this agency's policy and published a book of reference

B

本题考查的是楚汉战争。历史把刘邦和项羽争夺帝位的战争称之为楚汉战争，故选B。

每个词,除了in, and, of等词
实际上,这样的词语有时候也大写
另外有的标语每个字母都大写

C.松嫩平原——春小麦,甜菜,大豆

是C...某某某某某某

设最外层有 x 枚棋子,则从外到内五层棋子数分别为 x、x-4、x-8、x-12、x-16 ,
实心方针,每边棋子 20 枚,则共有 20*20 枚棋子；
可列方程：x+(x-4)+(x-8)+(x-12)+(x-16) = 20*20+30 ,
解得：x = 94 ,可得：x-16 = 78 ,
即：最外层有 94 枚棋子,最里层有 78 枚棋子.

分针1小时转一圈
3.14×2×9=56.52（厘米）
3.14×9×9=254.34（平方厘米）
答：分针尖端在1小时里走了56.52厘米,分针1小时扫过的面积是254.34平方厘米

3 -4 1
-2 0 2
-1 4 -3

大跃进后1960年国家针对国民经济制定了“调整、巩固、充实、提高”八字方针来纠正错误
“八字方针”的基本内容是：调整国民经济各部门的比例关系,主要是农轻重、工业内部、生产与基建、积累与消费等比例关系；巩固已经取得的经济建设成果；充实那些以工业品为原料的轻工业和手工业品的生产,发展塑料、化纤等新兴工业；提高产品质量,改善企业管理,提高劳动生产率.“八字方针”的中心是调整.

三条建议是：
　　①开张圣听（广开言路）；
　　②严明赏罚(赏罚分明）；
　　③亲贤臣,远小人( 亲贤远佞)

从8:55到9:15,钟表的方针转动的角度是120°,时针转动的角度是( 10º)?
120÷12＝10º

百花齐放 百家争鸣

我个人认为学习方针适合自己才是好的，虽然这话很没水平，但这是事实，我班里有学霸能整天做作业；还有做作业速度超快，做完就看课外书的；这些都是很难学的，因此只要能让自己每天都有进步即可，可以买教辅啊

如果是单选题的话应该选C,“双百方针’
多选的话选ABC.
中国共产党文化工作的基本方针包括两点：
第一,发展民族的科学的大众的文化.
第二,百花齐放,百家争鸣；古为今用,洋为中用.
D项是教育方针.

（1）使用天然气等清洁能源,减少二氧化碳等温室气体的排放.
（2）大力发展科技,进行煤的气化和液化以及脱硫处理.
（3）积极发展公共交通,限制私家车出行,对工业排放进行严格监测.
（4）大力植树造林,增加城市绿地和水域面积.
（5）加强国际合作,各国承担共同而有差别的任务.

表意思递进（紧承）
“团结──批评──团结”意思逐层深入,表示：从团结的愿望出发,经过批评,达到新的团结.破折号用法当然表示递进.

x+y=63
2x+2y=126
2x+1.5y=100
0.5y=26
y=52
x=11

0回答 17 秒钟前
建筑建材网里监理对于季度评分怎么评
0回答 6 秒钟前
怎样学习珠心算

因为 A^2-5A+5E=0
所以 A(A-2E)-3(A-2E)-E=0
所以 (A-3E)(A-2E)=E
所以 A-2E 可逆,且(A-2E)^-1 = A-3E

因为P^(-1)AP=对角阵（1,-1）
所以A=P*对角阵（1,-1）*P^(-1)
因此A的5次幂= P*对角阵（1,-1）的5次幂*P^(-1)
=矩阵1 0 乘以“对角阵（1,-1）的5次幂”乘以矩阵1 0的逆矩阵
1 1 1 1
=矩阵1 0 乘以“对角阵（1,-1）”乘以矩阵1 0
1 1 - 1 1
=1 0
2 -1
不好输入,抱歉!

First, product pricing is slightly higher than that of ordinary products we peer. We have to improve in the end market share as main policy, relying on marketable to increase our brand advantage. Our target customer group is located in the pursuit of health and beauty of fashion women, their pursuit of health and beauty regimen, the small gift might be interested. So we choose large shopping malls as our main selling point. We will be in the same period of new products listed in the city's major shopping malls have knowledge lecture on "beauty and health", in the popular beauty health knowledge and promote our black tea beverage. Stay in our propaganda area when the customers can enjoy free of charge, our black tea beverage. At the same time, in the next lecture is our new product promotion platform. If you buy a certain number of products, we will also have a little gift of exquisite gift.
Through a product strategy and promotion in this way, not only can improve the visibility of our brand, but also good to put our new product on the market.

Company Motto
Quality Policy

跨有荆、益,保其岩阻,西和诸戎,南抚夷越,外结好孙权,内修整理,天下有变,则命一上将将荆州之军以向宛、洛,将军身率益州之众出于秦川”.
整个成就霸业的战略分三步走：第一步,跨有荆、益,保其岩阻——建立稳固的根据地；第二步,西和诸戎,南抚夷越,外结好孙权,内修政理——稳定后方,做好内政外交上的准备；第三步,天下有变,则命一上将将荆州之军以向宛、洛,将军身率益州之众出于秦川——北定中原,成就霸业.

对啦!一国两制、港人冶港、50年不变.
香港的全称是中华人民共和国香港特别行政区（Hong Kong Special Administrative Region,简称HKSAR）,香港自秦朝起明确成为当时的中原领土,直至19世纪中叶清朝对外战败,领域分批被割让及租借予英国成为殖民地,香港从而开通港口发展.1980年代,中、英两国落实香港前途问题,于1984年签订《中英联合声明》,决定1997年7月1日中华人民共和国对香港恢复行使主权.中方承诺在香港实行一国两制,香港将保持资本主义制度和原有的生活方式,并享受外交及国防以外所有事务的高度自治权,也就是“港人治港、高度自治”.

解题思路：（1）根据氧气的质量通过方程式计算出需高锰酸钾和过氧化氢的质量；
（2）根据过氧化氢制氧气的装置和高锰酸钾制取氧气的装置图的比较考虑，再根据制取相同质量的氧气需要它们的价格考虑．

（1）设要制取3.2g氧气需要高锰酸钾质量为x，需要过氧化氢质量为y
2KMnO₄

△
.
K₂MnO₄+MnO₂+O₂↑
316 32
x3.2g
根据：[316/x＝
32
3.2g]
解得x=31.6g
2H₂O₂

MnO2
.
2H₂O+O₂↑
6832
y 3.2g
根据：[68/32＝
y
3.2g]
解得Y=6.8g，所以需质量分数为30%过氧化氢溶液的质量为：[6.8g/30%]=22.7g；
（2）由于过氧化氢制氧气不需加热，操作简单，并且制取相同质量（3.2g）O₂时购买H₂O₂（约0.49元）比KMnO₄（约0.96元）价格低．
故答案为：（1）理论上需高锰酸钾的质量为31.6g，需质量分数为30%的过氧化氢的质量为22.7g；
（2）采用双氧水制取氧气效果较好，原因是双氧水制取氧气操作简单且价格便宜；

点评：
本题考点： 根据化学反应方程式的计算．

考点点评： 根据化学反应方程式的计算的审题是非常关键的，一般是抓住“三找”；即一找化学反应方程式，二找已知量和未知量x，三找用到的相对质量关系，同时注意解题步骤和格式．

D

Ｃ


（A“誉为”缺宾语；B“人为的”与“蓄意”重复；D项前半句否定不当，后半句“很负盛名”语义重复；）

B正确处理人民内部矛盾的具体方针：在经济上,实行“统筹兼顾,适当安排”的方针；在共产党与民主党派关系上,实行“长期共存,互相监督”的方针；在科学文化工作上,实行“百花齐放,百家争鸣”的方针.选项B是抗战时期同顽固派做斗争的原则

没错的,更准确的说是SPC应当遵循的20字方针.

就拿最初的课本（比如刚学音标和字母时的那些书）就可以,再找个参考书,其实最好是买上最初级的课本,找个辅导老师.

设最外层有 x 枚棋子,则从外到内五层棋子数分别为 x、x-4、x-8、x-12、x-16 ,
实心方针,每边棋子 20 枚,则共有 20*20 枚棋子；
可列方程：x+(x-4)+(x-8)+(x-12)+(x-16) = 20*20+30 ,
解得：x = 94 ,可得：x-16 = 78 ,
即：最外层有 94 枚棋子,最里层有 78 枚棋子.

跨有荆益
兴复汉室,成就霸业
内修政理
西和诸戎,南抚夷越,外结好孙权
从荆州向宛、洛,从益州出秦川

四个尊重"方针的重要性:(1),劳动是人类生存和发展所需要的财富的源泉,也是产生和积累知识,发展和孕育人才,凝聚和提供创造力的源泉.(2),知识是创造财富的重要资源.(3)人才是创造财富的最重要的资源.(4),创造是人类社会不断发展的内驱力.

因为 A*=|A|A^-1=A^-1
所以 |A*-3A^-1|
= |A^-1-3A^-1|
= |-2A^-1|
= (-2)^2|A|^-1
= -4.

中国在万隆会议上提出了“求同存异”的方针,表明中国执行的是务实外交原则.（Y）
、“求同存异”方针中求同的基础是：殖民主义的痛苦和灾难.（Y）
这原来是道判断题 ,是概念 ,背下来就好了

1 ABDE 2 BDE 3 CD 4 ACD 5. ABCD

取吴抗曹,取荆、益二州,与周边和睦相处

隆中对,的事情发生在建安十二年（207年）,刘备三顾茅庐,诸葛亮（当时27岁）对刘备陈说三分天下之计

　　第一,全会实现了思想路线的拨乱反正.思想路线的拨乱反正是各方面拨乱反正的前提和先导.全会冲破了党的指导思想上存在的教条主义和个人崇拜的严重束缚,坚决批判和否定了“两个凡是”的错误方针,高度评价了关于真理标准问题的讨论,指出实践是检验真理的唯一标准是党的思想路线的根本原则,从而重新确立了马克思主义的实事求是的思想路线.会议在充分肯定毛泽东同志在我国长期革命斗争中的巨大作用的同时,着重强调要从科学体系上掌握和运用毛泽东思想,不能一切照搬照抄,不能搞“两个凡是”.否则,党和国家就会失去生机,就要亡党亡国.全会指出：“党中央在理论战线上的崇高任务,就是领导、教育全党和全国人民历史地科学地认识毛泽东同志的伟大功绩,完整地、准确地掌握毛泽东思想的科学体系,把马列主义、毛泽东思想的普遍原理同社会主义现代化建设的具体实践结合起来,并在新的历史条件下加以发展.”
　　第二,全会实现了政治路线的拨乱反正.这是最根本的拨乱反正.建国之初,党就要求各项工作必须以发展生产力为中心.党的八大确定要以在新的生产关系下保护和发展生产力为主要任务.这以后我们的失误,归根到底,就是背离了八大路线,搞了“以阶级斗争为纲”,没有集中力量进行经济建设.三中全会果断地作出把全党工作着重点和全国人民的注意力转移到社会主义现代化建设上来的战略决策.这是八大正确路线的恢复和发展,是在新的历史条件下对建设有中国自己特色社会主义道路的探索.
　　第三,全会作出了实行改革开放的新决策,启动了农村改革的新进程.全会在讨论1979、1980两年的国民经济计划安排时,提出了要注意解决国民经济重大比例失调,搞好综合平衡的要求.全会还讨论了农业问题,认为农业这个国民经济的基础就整体来说还十分薄弱,只有大力恢复和加快发展农业生产,才能提高全国人民的生活水平.全会提出了当前发展农业的一系列政策措施,并同意将《中共中央关于加快农业发展若干问题的决定（草案）》等文件发到各省、市、自治区讨论和试行.这个文件在经过修改和充实之后正式发布,接着一些重要的农业方面的文件相继制定和发布施行,有力地推动了农村改革的进程
　　给你总结下　思想路线：纠正左倾错误
　　政治路线：从以阶级斗争为纲转到以经济建设为中心
　　经济方针：改革开放

C.上层建筑对经济基础具有积极的能动作用

按照马克思主义,要辩证看,不同地方环境、资源都不一样,方针政策也应该不一样.搞一刀切是违背马克思主义基本原理的

7、B
8、AB

楼上要是老师,我就是教授了,明显没有谓语动词的句子你也说很准确
我的建议：
去掉The identification of
直接用External cooperation作为主语
谓语部分should be in ...
或者should accord with ...
如果是出版社建议用press

(1)①我国是人民民主专政的社会主义国家，我国政府是为人民服务的政府。建设生态文明是政府维护国家利益和人民利益的重要表现。
②我国政府以为人民服务为宗旨，政府要坚持对人民负责原则。建设生态文明，提高人民群众的生活质量是政府的宗旨和原则的要求。
③我国政府具有组织社会主义经济建设、提供社会公共服务的职能。建设生态文明是政府履行管理和服务职能的要求。
④我国政府坚持依法行政，科学民主决策。建设生态文明要靠政府具有合理性(每个要点3分)
(2)

具体部门
应该怎样做
为什么这样做

中共中央
制定大政方针，推进科学发展、提出立法建议(2分)
中国共产党是执政党，是中国特色社会主义事业的领导核心

全国人大
制定相关法律，监督法律的实施和其他国家机关的工作
全国人民代表大会是最高国家权力机关，拥有最高立法权和最高监督权(2分)

国务院
坚持对人民负责和依法行政的原则，依法履行好政府职能(2分)
国务院是我国的中央人民政府，是最高国家权力机关的执行机关，是人民意旨的执行者和利益的捍卫者(3分)

人民政协
履行政治协商、民主监督、参政议政职能(2分)
人民政协是我国的爱国统一战线组织，是发扬社会主义民主的重要形式(2分)


第(1)问考查学生运用政府的相关知识分析和探讨问题的能力，可从政府的性质、宗旨和原则、职能以及科学民主决策等方面回答。第(2)问以填表的形式考查学生运用中国共产党、全国人大、我国政府以及人民政协的知识解决问题的能力，作答时一定要看清主体，准确对号入座。

d