- CarieVinne
-
Q1 ; 首先要理解被动是被动be+p.p.是一个组合/不定词是不定词 to+v(原型)一个组合
没有to+be+p.p.这个组合. Q2 : The meeting to be held tomorrow is very important. ........我认为如下OK : .......The meeting (noun.) 那会议 .......to be (infinitive) 是 (将会) .......hold (noun.) 掌握 (一定得).....held是v 过去式要取消 .......tomorrow (adv.) 在明天 .......is ( V ) 是 .......very important. (adj.) 十分重要的. .......The meeting to be hold tomorrow 短语phrase作 subject. .......is 原动词 ...... very important. 补语 subject plement. SC Q3 : 全句只有is一个动词. Q4 ; 如改:The meeting is held tomorrow to be very important. ....... is held被动式作原动词
但有tomorrow时态就不妥. Q5 : The meeting would be held tomorrow to be very important. .......会议将会被掌握在明天是十分重要的. OK! Q6 : The meeting would be held tomorrow is very important. .......be held及is.....出现两个v . not OK! 2009-12-19 17:04:40 补充: 首先要了解[ 不定词infinitive ]功能只可作 / noun / adj / adv /. 不能作verb. 谈谈 [ 分词participle ]功能可作/ verb / adj / adv / . 分词有两种 : 一种是present participle=v+ing(same as gerund)其语态有[主动及被动]一般时及完成时 一种是past participle=p.p.其语态只有[ 被动 ].没有时态. The *** yst should write the questions that need to be wered. 2009-12-19 17:23:56 补充: that............从属连词..................那 need..........动词.........................需要 to be..........不定词......................是(去) wered...过去分词p.p.作adj......被回答的.(那些问题是需要去被回答的.) 是to+be不是再+ p.p... 而是to+be跟着是 p.p.作adj/adv.去修饰need需要什么?
您好,我推荐您一个非常不错的英语学习网站,里面有很多非常不错的学习资源,您能从中得到不少帮助: englishstudy.info 祝您好运!
首先可能要改变你对句子的看法。 The meeting
which is to be held tomorrow
is very important. 斜体包括标点是你看不见的部份。 所以基本上句主体是The meeting is very important. 中间那句clause只是加插来详细注明在说那一个meeting. 因此the meeting is held tomorow to be very important文法和句法都错到冇得改正。is held是现在式跟tomorrow不配;按上文句式the meeting
is held tomorrow
to be very important全句便冇了verb
或者the meeting
is held tomorrow
is (还原原句意思) very important便有两个verb.同道理因此 The meeting would be held tomorrow to be very important也是错。 所以你想用future tense也可以,不过英文to be已经包含future(to)和被动式(be)的用意,所以一般英语人都会用to be代表一些将来会做/发生的句式clause便大家都明白,不用下下都I will/shall. 另回应你问可否 The meeting would be held tomorrow is very important 其实上文已经答了,试找出当中的两个verb。 不过我想问你为何用would作future tense? would作为主future tense verb是有不确定的用意 e.g.1 I would like to go shopping tomorrow. e.g.2 I will go shopping tomorrow. 是两种不同的心态,说的听的都意会出e.g.1只是说说可能会,但e.g.2则比较肯定必然会。另外would亦有作为礼貌语 I would be glad to join you for lunch tomrrow并不是说他唔肯定明天会不会跟你食午餐,而是礼貌说我明天可以跟你食午餐,由你来决定。 所以学懂这些微妙的用法便不会误会外国人的意向。 由于公事上的meeting必然要发生的,亦不用甚么礼貌唔礼貌,所以不会用would。 另一个类似的字反而要常用should,不是shall的past tense将会,而是「应该要」的意思。 希望举一反三广阔你的理解。