APL 出现All Reviewers Secured 是什么意思

evaluation requests sent to reviewers向评审人员发送的评价请求重点词汇evaluation估价; <数>赋值; 估计价值reviewers评论家( reviewer的名词复数 )

potential reviewers潜在的审稿人

看投稿系统的要求，一般还是选择几个吧，便于审稿，速度快一些，从参考文献例找是最好的，引用的文献作者审稿可以有印象分嘛，说明你重视人家的研究成果，呵呵，另外，大牛谨慎选择，一个是邀请不到，另一个就是比较狠饿，还要看运气兄弟

还不是，主编一般要先发邮件征求对方意见，看对方是否愿意审稿，如果愿意，进入审稿程序，如果不愿意要再找人审，寻找审稿人的过程就是Reviewers Assigned。下面就是Under review了。

selecting/assigning reviewers选择/分配审稿人

这是代表所有审稿人已经开始审稿，all reviewers secured和review started其实是一个意思。apl只有一个审稿人，所谓all就是指那一个。你这篇文章命途多舛啊，竟然还有审稿人撤回审稿。。。这审稿人也真够不靠谱的。审稿结束的时候会有Decision Letter Being PreparedAssociate Editor Decision CompletedAssociate Editor Decision StartedAll Reviews ReceivedReview Received等等的status

response to reviewers 可以直接放在cover letter里面。cover letter里面要包含之前的ID号，然后在加一句 Attached please find our Response to Reviewers" Comments 类似的话就可以了This is a resubmmision of the manuscript entitled"xxx" with a previous ID xxxx.最好说明一下按照上次审稿人意见进行了大篇幅修改或者补充研究

Reviewers Assigned是“审稿人分配中”之后是：under reviewers“系统已经接受，正在审核中”，再后是：with reviewers是已经有人介入，还需要其他评审人员继续审核。最后是成功与否的提示，漫长啊！

是这样的：前者是说编辑从专家库（或者作者建议的审稿人名单）里联系了适合评审该稿件的审稿专家，并且这写专家表示有时间、愿意为杂志评审该稿件。在这种情况下，编辑会将在线投稿系统中稿件的状态改为"reviewers invited". 当审稿人登录系统获取了待审稿件后，系统就自动将状态改为"under review".

with reviewers评论家 拼音 双语对照 双语例句1Connecting ideas with writers, writers with reviewers, and ultimately writers with readers. 他们连接作者之间、作者和评审人员、最后的作者和读者的想法。

Reviewers Assigned是“正在分配审核人”此后，under reviewers“系统已经接受，正在审核中”，再后，with reviewers是已经有人介入，还需要其他评审人员继续审核

您好，就是在找审稿人。很快就会变成under review，说明送给审稿人了。 看审稿人的速度了，一般一个月内，编辑会给你一审结果。 希望我的回答能够给您带来帮助!如果您满意，请采纳，如果您有疑问，可以继续追问。您还可以向我所在的团队发出请求，将会有更加专业的人员来为您解决问题。

[pu0259u02c8tu025bnu0283u0259l]adj.潜在的，有可能的n.潜力，潜能

就推荐的评审人在论文所涉及的领域有较好的研究，比较权威即可。Reason这一栏好像没有打星号，是不是可以不用填。如果必须填的话，建议以下内容：This scientist is an expert in the field of our study and is able to provide an objective assessment of our manuscript. He did not publish with any of the authors of our submitted manuscript within the past five years and is not a member of the same research institution.

问题一：如何回复SCI投稿审稿人意见 第三个审稿人的意见如下： Reviewer #3: The present paper addresses a hot topic of interest in the area. The first part section the paper presents a brief and concise state of the art of the domain approached. Since this topic has been intensively studied during the last decade and a large number of papers and books have been published, this part might be extended to include the most recent research in this domain, and have to be included in Chapter +References: R.O. Preda, D.N. Vizireanu, Blind Watermarking Capacity Analysis of MPEG2 Coded Video, IEEE TELSIKS 2007, 8th International Conference on Telemunications in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services, 26-28 Sept. 2007, Nis, Serbia and Montenegro, p. 465-468. D.N. VIZIREANU, R.O Preda, BD Milovanovic, A New Digital Watermarking scheme for Image Copyright Protection using Wavelet Packets, IEEE TELSIKS 2005, 7th Intern. Conf. on Telem. in Modern Satellite, Cable and Broadcasting Services, 28-30 September 2005, Nis, Serbia and Montenegro, p. 518-521. Some interesting papers have been published recently in CS&SP and have to be included in Chapter 1 +References. The authors contribution is not clearly underlined. Moreover, the performance design criteria are not addressed in the simulation part. The simulation results presented are sometimes uncler. The abbreviations presented in figures are not clear and should be explained in more detail. The results should be more emphasized and the concl......>> 问题二：sci第二次修改 该怎么写回复信件 List of Responses Dear Editors and Reviewers: Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers" ments concerning ourmanuscript entitled “Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Those ments are all valuable and very helpfulfor revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guidingsignificance to our researches. We have studied ments carefully and havemade correction which we hope meet with approval. Revised portion are marked inred in the paper. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to thereviewer"s ments are as flowing: Responds to the reviewer"s ments: Reviewer #1: 1. Response to ment: (……简要列出意见……) Response: ×××××× 2. Response to ment: (……简要列出意见……) Response: ×××××× 。。。。。。 逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏 针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用： 问题三：如何回复SCI投稿审稿人意见 给范文：Response to ments Dear Editors and Reviewers: Thank you for your letter and for the reviewers" ments concerning our manuscript entitled xxxxxxxxxxxxxx. Those ments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving our paper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We have studied ments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet with approval. The main corrections in the paper and the responds to the reviewer"s ments are as following: ments:（列举提问题切忌要遗漏任何项） 1. ......... Please check and revise. 2. .......... Please revise. 3. .......... Response:（表示遗憾谢并且详细说明改进程/或解释审稿疑惑要详细题号要应面问题编号） 1. We are very sorry for our unclear report in...... 2. It is our negligence and we are sorry about this. According to ment, related content have been improved. ....... 3. As the Reviewer"s good advice, ....... Special thanks to you for your good ments. 20xx-xx-xx 国外审稿人是义务的，可以根据文章质量和自己的看法自由地提出意见和建议。国外审稿人绝大多数治学严谨，很注重reputation，可以说拿信誉当生 命。当他们接到审稿要求时，如果很忙或不懂你的专业或领域，他们会decline。但只要答应审稿，一般都是尽职尽责的完成审稿任务。因此，当你接到审稿 人的意见时，首先要摆正心态，保持冷静。不要用偏见的心态去断定审稿人有偏见、歧视。做研究的确很辛苦，发表文章也确实很不容易。但审稿人同 样也很辛苦，也很不容易。他们认认真真地阅读你的文章，给你提出中肯的意见，甚至很好的建议。如果还被你措辞强硬的怪罪一阵，换着谁也会生气。要知道，找 理由拒绝一篇文章并不是一件很难的事情。因此，这个时候，你一定要好好的静下心来，好好分析sci论文发表审稿人的意见，找出问题的所在。 1.所有问题必须逐条回答；2.尽量满足意见中需要补充的实验；3.满足不了的也不要回避，说明不能做的合理理由；4。对于你不认同的意见，也要委婉有技巧地回答，做到有理有据有节；5. 审稿人推荐的文献一定要引用，并加以讨论。...>> 问题四：论文审稿意见怎么写 我以前的博士论文，评阅人就是根据我论文里的摘要写的，精炼一下就OK了。评阅书里面应该有自己写的创新点，你可以参照写一下。leonshane(站内联系TA)首先对这篇论文进行简单概括，指出其主要线索：研究目标、方法、意义、创新等，然后指出一两个最大的问题，如果其问题的确是致命的话，那么久建议修改。 你写完你导师会帮你把关的，如果他不看，建议你申请换导师。。。shuoyeb(站内联系TA)一、概况评价项目：论文的创新性成果 论文的学术价值及应用价值 论文反映出作者的基础理论和专门知识水平论文写作论文总体评价 二、综合所有评阅人对论文的学术评语 （选题的意义，论文的创新性成果，学术价值及应用价值，实验结果和计算数据的合理性及可靠性等）……三、论文中存在的问题、不足及意见或建议 1. 评议人认为第*章第*节****中有****的问题*****。 2. ……lbh535(站内联系TA)评审意见应点面结合。面就是总体概况，而点则至少体现评阅人有没有仔细看内容。现在好多论文评审一审就是一大批，特别是社会科学方面的，评阅意见都写些泛泛而谈的东西，感觉评阅人就没太仔细看。qiuqu_200212(站内联系TA)建议答辩，然后简单写些评语即可。k10001(站内联系TA)还有一段八股：论文表明，***在所研究领域掌握了坚实宽广的基础理论和系统深入的专门知识，具备了（很强的）独立从事科学研究工作的能力，论文（具有创新性，）达到了博士论文学术水平。建议组织博士学位论文答辩。nono2009(站内联系TA)评阅表中有提示的，按提示要求的几项内容写评阅意见即可。songjm12(站内联系TA)好好阅读评审书前两页要求部分 写好评语就行了yuffey(站内联系TA)研究问题清晰不，研究目标明确不，方法得当不，结果明显不？ 工作量饱满不，内容充实不？等等 最好的方法是，找个以前的博士论文，抄写抄写。八股文~~ 问题五：sci怎么回复审稿意见 小木虫 问: sci投稿，四个审稿人，两个提了问题，两个改的格式，一个在原文上改，直接发的pdf，估计修改的有一百多处吧，另一个提出第几页第几行改什么等等，编辑要求在修订模式下修改原文，我还需要一一回复修改格式的审稿人么，如何回复他修改的格式呢，他没有提问题，只帮我改了格式。 答: 原则上不用~ 既然在修订模式下进行~ 就一次到位~ 问题六：sci审稿意见回复写在一封信里吗 需要啊~ 而且最好有一个word文档逐条去回复审稿人的意见以及你是如何修改的，并且在修改稿里面用不同的颜色标注出你所修改的部分。 回复审稿意见一定要认真。谦虚这方面，你可以从他提的问题去判断审稿人的水平。如果提的问题明显外行，可以强势一些。不是说每个问题都要修改，但是每个问题都要回应。 问题七：大修审稿意见，重金求教如何回复 投稿Energy，35天后返回修改，给的大修，求教有经验的虫友如何回复审稿意见比较好。另外，为什么附件里只有一个人的审稿人意见？Dear***, The review of this paper is now plete, and I am including the Reviewers" reports (directly at the end of this email and sometimes as attachments). As you can see, one Reviewer remends rejection, and the others remend possible reconsideration after major revisions. If you are able to revise the manuscript thoroughly in response to the Reviewers" ments, I believe that it would be suitable for second review. I should add that, in view of the strong critici *** s, anything but a thorough response and revision would just be an unfortunate waste of time. Once you have revised the paper accordingly, please submit with it a note describing in detail your response to these ments and a separate copy of the revised paper marked up to indicate where the revisions were made. NOTE: Upon submitting your revised manuscript, please upload the source files for your article. For additional details regarding acceptable file formats, please refer to the Guide for Authors at: elsevier/...uthors When submitting your revised paper, we ask that you include the following items: Manuscript and Figure Source Files (mandatory) We cannot acmodate PDF manuscript files for production purposes. We also ask that when submitting your revision you follow the journal fo......>> 问题八：如何回复编辑和审稿人 回复审稿人的格式很简单，先感谢审稿人的宝贵意见，接着说已经按照要求修改过了，然后就是修改的明细，通常是一问一答，先是审稿人的意见，然后是自己的回答。 问题九：工科类文章审稿意见怎么写 英文 工科类文章审稿意见 Review ments on the article of Engineering 工科类文章审稿意见 Review ments on the article of Engineering 问题十：论文接收 英文审稿意见 怎么写 ①正确性：论点的说服力根植于对客观事物的正确反映，而这又取决于作者的立场、观点、态度、方法是否正确，如果论点本身不正确，甚至是荒谬的，再怎么论证也不能说服人。因此，论点正确是论文的最起码的要求。 ②鲜明性：赞成什么、反对什么，要非常鲜明，千万不能模棱两可，含糊不清。 ③新颖性：论点应该尽可能新颖、深刻，能超出他人的见解，不是重复他人的老生常谈，也不是无关痛痒、流于一般的泛泛而谈，应该尽可能独特、新颖。

参考视频写一篇高水平的工程类英文论文_7_如何回复审稿人＋总结＋两位牛人的建议网页链接

这是你投稿时自己可以推荐几个审稿人，理由就说该审稿人是该领域的专家，对该领域的研究现状很熟悉即可。

这是代表所有审稿人已经开始审稿，all reviewers secured和review started其实是一个意思。apl只有一个审稿人，所谓all就是指那一个。你这篇文章命途多舛啊，竟然还有审稿人撤回审稿。。。这审稿人也真够不靠谱的。审稿结束的时候会有Decision Letter Being PreparedAssociate Editor Decision CompletedAssociate Editor Decision StartedAll Reviews ReceivedReview Received等等的status您好，答案已经给出，请您浏览一遍有什么不懂的地方欢迎回复我！如果满意请及时点击【采纳为满意答案】按钮或者客户端的朋友在右上角评价点【满意】您的采纳，是我答题的动力也同时给您带来知识和财富值O(∩_∩)O谢谢您！！！

Theirs was a serious business,and even those reviewers who wore their learning lightly,like George Bernard Shaw and Ernest Newman,could be trusted to know what they were about.词汇：1. business工作 2. reviewer评论家 3.wear one"s learning lightly不卖弄学问 3. learning 学问 4.lightly轻微地 5.be about从事于分句1：Theirs was a serious business分句2：even those reviewers could be trusted to know（主语补语）后置定语：who wore their learning lightly介词短语作后置定语：like George Bernard Shaw and Ernest Newman宾语从句： what they were about参考译文：他们所从事的是严肃的工作，即使像萧伯纳和欧内斯特 纽曼一样不卖弄自己学问的评论家，也知道自己在做什么，这点足以让人信任。翻译之道：1.句中的to know what they were about是主语 those reviewers的补语，译者将主语和补语处理成并列分句，末尾以“这”字进行概括，符合翻译之道，值得一学。2.句中的who从句直接译为定语，不显局促，可取。

JPE很慢很慢的，不如IEEE tpel快。我的一篇分配给AE已经3个月了，也就是你现在的状态。一般情况是Editor分配给AE后，AE给找审稿人，审稿人接受邀请后，就看人家心情了。之后就是AE汇总审稿意见并将是拒是收的意见给主编EIC，然后EIC发给作者是Major revision 还是Minor revision，或者Unaccept。

自己没写过，听人说需要几个内容：1，直接表达你要对方review的商品；2，询问对方review的单价和持续时间；3，确定支付方式

编辑正在评估审稿人的意见，俗点就是在汇总审稿人的意见，然后给出编辑的总体意见。等着吧，很快会有消息的，但愿是大喜事！

potential reviewers潜在的审稿人-----------------------------------如有疑问欢迎追问！满意请点击右上方【选为满意回答】按钮

看投稿系统的要求，一般还是选择几个吧，便于审稿，速度快一些，从参考文献例找是最好的，引用的文献作者审稿可以有印象分嘛，说明你重视人家的研究成果，呵呵，另外，大牛谨慎选择，一个是邀请不到，另一个就是比较狠饿，还要看运气兄弟很高兴为您解答!有不明白的可以追问！如果您认可我的回答。请点击下面的【选为满意回答】按钮，谢谢！

with reviewers和under reviewers的区别这时投稿时的两种状态under reviewers系统已经接受，正在审核中，with reviewers是已经有人介入，还需要其他评审人员继续审核

还不是，主编一般要先发邮件征求对方意见，看对方是否愿意审稿，如果愿意，进入审稿程序，如果不愿意要再找人审，寻找审稿人的过程就是Reviewers Assigned。

这是代表所有审稿人已经开始审稿,all reviewers secured和review started其实是一个意思.apl只有一个审稿人,所谓all就是指那一个.你这篇文章命途多舛啊,竟然还有审稿人撤回审稿.这审稿人也真够不靠谱的.审稿结束的时候会有Decision Letter Being PreparedAssociate Editor Decision CompletedAssociate Editor Decision StartedAll Reviews ReceivedReview Received等等的status您好,答案已经给出,请您浏览一遍有什么不懂的地方欢迎回复我!如果满意请及时点击【采纳为满意答案】按钮或者客户端的朋友在右上角评价点【满意】您的采纳,是我答题的动力也同时给您带来知识和财富值

这是代表所有审稿人已经开始审稿,all reviewers secured和review started其实是一个意思.apl只有一个审稿人,所谓all就是指那一个.你这篇文章命途多舛啊,竟然还有审稿人撤回审稿.这审稿人也真够不靠谱的.审稿结束的时候会有Decision Letter Being PreparedAssociate Editor Decision CompletedAssociate Editor Decision StartedAll Reviews ReceivedReview Received等等的status您好,答案已经给出,请您浏览一遍有什么不懂的地方欢迎回复我!

投稿状态显示add reviewers是添加评论的意思

这是代表所有审稿人已经开始审稿,all reviewers secured和review started其实是一个意思.apl只有一个审稿人,所谓all就是指那一个.你这篇文章命途多舛啊,竟然还有审稿人撤回审稿.这审稿人也真够不靠谱的.审稿结束的时候会有Decision Letter Being PreparedAssociate Editor Decision CompletedAssociate Editor Decision StartedAll Reviews ReceivedReview Received等等的status

In summary, the major revisions made in the revised manuscript are listed as follows:Introduction, Page 3 Lines 9-12;Materials and methods, Page 4 Lines 15~16Results and discussion, Page 6 Line 12, Page 7 Lines 3, 13 and 14, Page 8 Lines 7~9, 13, Page 9 Line 6, Page 10 Lines 3~6 and 17, Page 11 Lines 4, 6, 7, 9, 13 and 17, Page 12 Lines 1, 8, 10, 12, 15 and 21, Page 13 Line 3, 4, 16 and 21, Page 14 Lines 9, 13, 18 and 19, Page 15 Lines 4, 5, 11 and 19, Page 16 Lines 1, 15, 18 and 20, Page 17 Lines 3, 7, 14 15 and 17, Page 18 Lines 3, 5, 8 and 18~22, Page 19 Lines 1 and 9;References, Page 20 Lines 13~16, Page 22 Lines 18~20, Page 23 Lines 2~4.Figurer Captions, Page 24 Lines 9 and 15, Page 25 Lines 5 and 11.In addition, the manuscript has been sent to a native English speaker for improved English usage to meet the high standards of 杂志. The changes made upon the original manuscript have been highlighted in yellow in the revised manuscript.

有风险的，亚马逊现在严打top reviewers ，建议你不要找top reviewers

List of ResponsesDear Editors and Reviewers:Thank you for your letter and for thereviewers" commentsconcerning our manuscript entitled“Paper Title” (ID: 文章稿号). Thosecomments are all valuable and very helpful for revising and improving ourpaper, as well as the important guiding significance to our researches. We havestudied comments carefully and have made correction which we hope meet withapproval. Revised portion are marked in red in the paper. The main correctionsin the paper and the responds to the reviewer"s comments are as flowing:Responds to the reviewer"s comments:Reviewer #1:1. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××2. Response to comment: (……简要列出意见……)Response: ××××××。。。。。。逐条意见回答，切忌一定不能有遗漏针对不同的问题有下列几个礼貌术语可适当用用：We are very sorry for our negligence of……...We are very sorry for our incorrect writing……...It is really true as Reviewer suggestedthat……We have made correction according to theReviewer"s comments.We have re-written this part according tothe Reviewer"s suggestionAs Reviewer suggested that……Considering the Reviewer"s suggestion, wehave ……最后特意感谢一下这个审稿人的意见：Special thanks to you for your goodcomments.Reviewer #2:同上述Reviewer #3:××××××Other changes:1. Line 60-61, the statements of “……” werecorrected as “…………”2. Line 107, “……” was added3. Line 129, “……” was deleted××××××Wetried our best to improve the manuscript and made some changes in themanuscript. These changes will notinfluence the content and framework of the paper. And here we did not list thechanges but marked in red in revised paper.We appreciate for Editors/Reviewers" warmwork earnestly, and hope that the correction will meet with approval.Once again, thank you very much for yourcomments and suggestions.

这是代表所有审稿人已经开始审稿，all reviewers secured和review started其实是一个意思。apl只有一个审稿人，所谓all就是指那一个。你这篇文章命途多舛啊，竟然还有审稿人撤回审稿。。。这审稿人也真够不靠谱的。审稿结束的时候会有Decision Letter Being PreparedAssociate Editor Decision CompletedAssociate Editor Decision StartedAll Reviews ReceivedReview Received等等的status您好，答案已经给出，请您浏览一遍有什么不懂的地方欢迎回复我！如果满意请及时点击【采纳为满意答案】按钮或者客户端的朋友在右上角评价点【满意】您的采纳，是我答题的动力也同时给您带来知识和财富值O(∩_∩)O谢谢您！！！

Reason这一栏好像没有打星号，是不是可以不用填。如果必须填的话，建议以下内容：This scientist is an expert in the field of our study and is able to provide an objective assessment of our manuscript. He did not publish with any of the authors of our submitted manuscript within the past five years and is not a member of the same research institution.供参考，Good luck！

Reason这一栏好像没有打星号，是不是可以不用填。如果必须填的话，建议以下内容：This scientist is an expert in the field of our study and is able to provide an objective assessment of our manuscript. He did not publish with any of the authors of our submitted manuscript within the past five years and is not a member of the same research institution.

response to reviewers 可以直接放在cover letter里面。cover letter里面要包含之前的ID号，然后在加一句 Attached please find our Response to Reviewers" Comments 类似的话就可以了This is a resubmmision of the manuscript entitled"xxx" with a previous ID xxxx.最好说明一下按照上次审稿人意见进行了大篇幅修改或者补充研究

View LetterCloseDate: Apr 10, 2012To: ×××From: "European Journal of Radiology" ejr@elsevier.comSubject: Your SubmissionMs. Ref. No.: EJR - D - 12 - 00059R1Title: ×××European Journal of RadiologyDear ×××,I am pleased to inform you that, following peer review, your paper has been accepted for publication.We currently have a large backlog of papers awaiting publication. Currently a paper is not compiled into a print issue until approximately 12 months after acceptance. Your paper will appear online as an article in press within six weeks.In order to reduce the time taken for an article to appear in an issue, we are currently offering authors the opportunity to select online only publication for their paper. The title of your paper will appear in the print table of contents but the full article will only appear online. The article will be given a Volume and Issue Number and an e - page number which can be used for citation purposes and all citations to your paper will be counted in the Science Citation Index.If you would like to select this option for your paper, or require further information, please contact the editorial office ejr@elsevier.comKind regards,Johan G Hans Blickman , MD, PhDEditor- in - ChiefEuropean Journal of Radiology

Decision Sent to Reviewers审稿意见重点词汇释义Decision决定; 决议; 果断; 判决; 靠判定击败Reviewers评论家( reviewer的名词复数 )

securing reviewers确保审稿-----------------------------------如有疑问欢迎追问！满意请点击右上方【选为满意回答】按钮

编辑要求在COVER LETTER逐点解释修改的内容，对所有同行评议的内容都应逐点解释。逐点的意思是要回答审稿人的每个问题。而不是详细列举在文章中如何具体修改的（用红色标出来就可以了或是word的跟踪修订功能）SCI文章修回的COVER LETTER模板如下：Dear Dr.XXXX,Thank you very much for your letter and advice. We have revised the paper, and would like to re-submit it for your consideration. We have addressed the comments raised by the reviewers, and the amendments are highlighted in red in the revised manuscript. We hope that the revision is acceptable, and I look forward to hearing from you soon. With best wishes,Yours sincerely,XXXXXX================================================================（换页）We would like to express our sincere thanks to the reviewers for the constructive and positive comments.Replies to Reviewer 1XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXReplies to Reviewer 2XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXReplies to Reviewer 3XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX

Reason这一栏好像没有打星号，是不是可以不用填。如果必须填的话，建议以下内容：This scientist is an expert in the field of our study and is able to provide an objective assessment of our manuscript. He did not publish with any of the authors of our submitted manuscript within the past five years and is not a member of the same research institution.供参考，Good luck！

Reason这一栏好像没有打星号,是不是可以不用填.如果必须填的话,建议以下内容：This scientist is an expert in the field of our study and is able to provide an objective assessment of our manuscript.He did not publish with any of the authors of our submitted manuscript within the past five years and is not a member of the same research institution. 供参考,Good luck!

写三个建议就行了，随便写

全部审稿人都同意审稿，说明已经开始进入审稿状态了。

APL 出现All Reviewers SecuredAPL出现所有审稿人的担保APL 出现All Reviewers SecuredAPL出现所有审稿人的担保

数学类的期刊审稿大部分偏慢，Reviewers Assigned状态看情况吧，这是在分配审稿人，等待审稿人的回复，一些审稿人不愿意审稿，就拖拉了。1月都有可能，如果找到的审稿人很愉快的接受审稿，3~7天也很常见，看运气吧在30天左右还是Reviewers Assigned建议发信问一下，有可能已经送审了，只是状态没有变更而已，这种情况当然是最好的。

当期刊向审稿人征求建议时，他们需要一份能够提供建设性批评和客观分析的相关专家名单。审稿人对稿件提出公正的意见是很非常重要的。在某些情况下，如果编辑没有为您的稿件找到合适的审稿人，推荐的审稿人名单就成了一种宝贵的资源。编辑没有义务选择推荐的审稿人，但这份名单可以作为搜索具有类似专业知识专家的来源。您是否曾经向同一期刊投稿不是问题的关键，重要的是要确保推荐的审稿人具备该领域的经验和良好的专业知识。选择推荐的审稿人时，一种策略是选择那些在您的参考文献列表中的作者，或其论文构成您研究重要依据的作者。另一种策略是仔细探索您的研究领域，找出愿意审查您的研究的学者。建议来自世界各地的审稿人可能会让他们对您的研究工作有一个全面的看法。如果您还需要推荐同一组审稿人，您可以在投稿信的末尾提供这样做的理由。

manuscript assigned to reviewers稿件分配给审稿人manuscript assigned to reviewers稿件分配给审稿人

sci投稿了，仅仅是发表sci论文的开始，之后投稿是否成功了、是否审核了、是否录用了等，作者可以通过“投稿状态”进行了解。那么，sci投稿状态有哪些? 1、Submitted to Journal(稿件提交) 发sci要按照期刊规定的投稿途径提交文章。当按提交按钮后，就会显示“Submitted to Journal”，代表文章刚提交。 2、Manuscript received by Editorial Office(投稿成功)/submission incomplete(稿件退回给作者) 投稿有成功和没有成功之分，当显示“Manuscript received by Editorial Office”，代表投稿成功。当显示“submission incomplete”，代表投稿没有成功，需要作者仔细核对，可能有些步骤没做。 3、With editor(稿件被分配) 投稿成功的稿件，会分配给不同的责任编辑处理。 4、Reviewers assigned(选好审稿人) 责任编辑处理稿件会有两种结果，一种是拒稿，另外一种是匹配合适的审稿人。当显示“Reviewers assigned”，说明编辑选好了审稿人，代表稿件进入下一环节。 5、Under review(审稿人正在审稿) 审稿人同意后，要对稿件进行审核，这一过程等待时间较长。 6、Review completed(审稿人提交报告) 审稿人审核完毕后，什么结果，会以报告的形式提交给责任编辑。 7、Evaluating Recommendation(评估审稿人意见) 审稿人的意见如何，责任编辑要进行评估。 8、Decision in Process(等待稿件处理意见) 评估审稿人意见完毕后，稿件是录用、修改还是拒稿。 9、Minor revision(小修)/Major revision(大修) 处理意见是修改的话，分为小修和大修。作者要根据修改意见完成稿件的修改。 10、Revision Submitted(返修) 修改后的稿件应该在规定时间内重新提交给期刊方受理。 11、Revision Submitted to Journal(又开始一个循环) 返修的稿件到底如何，需要开启新一轮的审核程序。 12、Accepted(接受/录用) 稿件达到了期刊录用的标准，就会被接受或录用。从而进入下一个阶段。 13、Rejected(拒稿) 稿件达不到期刊录用的标准，就会被期刊拒稿。作者可以修改后重投或改投其他期刊。